FDIQ vs. VFH
FDIQ (Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - FDIQ tracks the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index while VFH tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDIQ returned 7.60%/yr vs 12.20%/yr for VFH. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDIQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VFH.
Performance
FDIQ vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIQ achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -6.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIQ has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 7.60%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.20% annualized return.
FDIQ
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- 1Y
- 22.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
VFH
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -6.40%
- 6M
- -3.96%
- 1Y
- 2.39%
- 3Y*
- 18.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
FDIQ vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 9.72% | 6.32% | 12.76% | -0.84% | -7.23% | 36.05% | -8.95% | 23.57% | -18.31% | 1.81% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -6.40% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIQ and VFH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2011 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FDIQ and VFH shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIQ vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
FDIQ
VFH
FDIQ vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIQ | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.04 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 0.16 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 0.43 | +4.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIQ | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.16 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.41 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.54 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.24 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
FDIQ vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIQ and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIQ | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.86% | -78.61% | +25.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -14.75% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | -17.30% | -10.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.99% | -25.66% | -17.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.86% | -44.42% | -8.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.53% | -9.24% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.56% | -18.54% | +6.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 5.55% | -1.17% |
Volatility
FDIQ vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 3.34%. This indicates that FDIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIQ | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 3.34% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.93% | 11.10% | +2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.14% | 14.79% | +7.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 19.31% | +9.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.12% | 22.54% | +8.58% |
FDIQ vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIQ vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
FDIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than VFH's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 2.56% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.89% | 2.51% | 2.04% | 2.92% | 2.44% | 2.45% | 1.59% | 1.50% | 1.92% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.56% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIQ and VFH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDIQ has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to VFH (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIQ dropped -52.86% vs VFH's -78.61%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.20% vs 7.60% for FDIQ. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.20% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FDIQ.
FDIQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.56% for VFH.
FDIQ tracks Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIQ and 0.10% for VFH.
FDIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIQ and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer