PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIQ vs. PBDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDIQ vs. PBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDIQ vs. PBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
11.45%6.32%12.76%-0.84%3.99%
PBDC
Putnam BDC Income ETF
-9.87%-1.77%19.43%30.52%10.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIQ achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than PBDC's -9.87% return.


FDIQ

1D
1.80%
1M
-5.59%
YTD
11.45%
6M
14.36%
1Y
25.32%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
8.58%

PBDC

1D
2.38%
1M
2.99%
YTD
-9.87%
6M
-8.48%
1Y
-12.07%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDIQ vs. PBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PBDC's 6.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDIQ vs. PBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIQ
FDIQ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FDIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

PBDC
PBDC Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIQ vs. PBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDIQPBDCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

-0.56

+1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.38

-0.66

+2.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.92

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

-0.61

+2.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.45

-1.29

+6.74

FDIQ vs. PBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the PBDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIQ and PBDC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDIQPBDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

-0.56

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.78

-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between FDIQ and PBDC is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FDIQ vs. PBDC - Dividend Comparison

FDIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than PBDC's 11.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
2.52%2.66%2.69%2.89%2.51%2.04%2.92%2.44%2.45%1.59%1.50%1.92%
PBDC
Putnam BDC Income ETF
11.69%10.53%9.29%9.86%3.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FDIQ vs. PBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, which is greater than PBDC's maximum drawdown of -20.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIQ and PBDC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIQPBDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.86%

-20.47%

-32.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-20.15%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.08%

-17.32%

+10.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-4.13%

-7.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.84%

9.47%

-4.63%

Volatility

FDIQ vs. PBDC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) have volatilities of 5.91% and 6.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDIQPBDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

6.16%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.49%

14.25%

+3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.55%

21.62%

+5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.94%

16.73%

+12.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.21%

16.73%

+14.48%