FDIQ vs. KBWB
FDIQ (Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF) and KBWB (Invesco KBW Bank ETF) are both Financials Equities funds from Invesco - FDIQ tracks the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index while KBWB tracks the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDIQ returned 7.93%/yr vs 14.07%/yr for KBWB. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
FDIQ vs. KBWB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIQ achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than KBWB's 12.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIQ has underperformed KBWB with an annualized return of 7.93%, while KBWB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.07% annualized return.
FDIQ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -7.75%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- 17.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
KBWB
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 9.33%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 40.49%
- 3Y*
- 37.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 14.07%
FDIQ vs. KBWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 5.60% | 6.32% | 12.76% | -0.84% | -7.23% | 36.05% | -8.95% | 23.57% | -18.31% | 1.81% |
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF | 12.95% | 32.05% | 36.73% | -1.18% | -21.68% | 37.72% | -10.46% | 35.90% | -18.30% | 18.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIQ and KBWB is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2011 | 0.85 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDIQ and KBWB has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIQ vs. KBWB — Risk / Return Rank
FDIQ
KBWB
FDIQ vs. KBWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIQ | KBWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.35 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 2.48 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 7.81 | -4.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIQ vs. KBWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, which is greater than KBWB's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIQ and KBWB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIQ | KBWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.86% | -50.27% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -16.38% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | -25.43% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.99% | -49.31% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.86% | -50.27% | -2.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.96% | 0.00% | -11.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.54% | -11.70% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 5.20% | -0.41% |
Volatility
FDIQ vs. KBWB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) have volatilities of 5.49% and 5.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIQ | KBWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 5.65% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.13% | 15.89% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.13% | 20.26% | +1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.54% | 26.55% | +1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.05% | 29.12% | +1.93% |
FDIQ vs. KBWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FDIQ and KBWB have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
FDIQ vs. KBWB - Dividend Comparison
FDIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than KBWB's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 2.36% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.89% | 2.51% | 2.04% | 2.92% | 2.44% | 2.45% | 1.59% | 1.50% | 1.92% |
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF | 1.97% | 2.04% | 2.46% | 3.20% | 3.05% | 2.13% | 2.62% | 2.38% | 2.54% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIQ and KBWB have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBWB has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to FDIQ (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIQ dropped -52.86% vs KBWB's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, KBWB leads with 14.07% vs 7.93% for FDIQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, FDIQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 14.07% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIQ and KBWB have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
FDIQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 1.97% for KBWB.
FDIQ tracks Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index, while KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index.
KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIQ and KBWB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer