PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIQ vs. EUFN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIQ vs. EUFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIQ achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly higher than EUFN's 1.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIQ has underperformed EUFN with an annualized return of 7.70%, while EUFN has yielded a comparatively higher 11.98% annualized return.


FDIQ

1D
-2.91%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
10.79%
6M
13.45%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
7.70%

EUFN

1D
-2.03%
1M
2.59%
YTD
1.54%
6M
8.77%
1Y
23.06%
3Y*
30.91%
5Y*
17.47%
10Y*
11.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIQ vs. EUFN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
10.79%6.32%12.76%-0.84%-7.23%36.05%-8.95%23.57%-18.31%1.81%
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
1.54%65.73%17.20%26.15%-8.78%19.13%-8.55%20.73%-23.14%26.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIQ and EUFN is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2011

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between FDIQ and EUFN has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIQ vs. EUFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIQ
FDIQ Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FDIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

EUFN
EUFN Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EUFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUFN Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EUFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUFN Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIQ vs. EUFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDIQEUFNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

1.17

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.74

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

1.57

+0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.64

5.49

+0.15

FDIQ vs. EUFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the EUFN Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIQ and EUFN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDIQEUFNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.17

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.81

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.49

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.27

+0.11

Drawdowns

FDIQ vs. EUFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, roughly equal to the maximum EUFN drawdown of -53.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIQ and EUFN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIQEUFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.86%

-53.25%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-14.77%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

-15.95%

-12.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.99%

-35.15%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.86%

-53.25%

+0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.63%

-3.16%

-4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.56%

-14.56%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

4.21%

+0.14%

Volatility

FDIQ vs. EUFN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) is 4.00%, while iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that FDIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDIQEUFNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

7.00%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

16.56%

-2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.16%

19.75%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.69%

21.80%

+6.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.12%

24.55%

+6.57%

FDIQ vs. EUFN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EUFN's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIQ vs. EUFN - Dividend Comparison

FDIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than EUFN's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
3.52%3.57%5.36%5.00%4.24%4.15%1.38%4.55%6.48%3.04%4.03%3.65%
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
2.53%2.66%2.69%2.89%2.51%2.04%2.92%2.44%2.45%1.59%1.50%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIQ and EUFN have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EUFN has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to FDIQ (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIQ dropped -52.86% vs EUFN's -53.25%.

On 10-year performance, EUFN leads with 11.98% vs 7.70% for FDIQ. On fees, FDIQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FDIQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EUFN has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 7.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EUFN.

EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.53% for FDIQ.

FDIQ tracks Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index, while EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIQ and 0.48% for EUFN.

FDIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIQ and EUFN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer