PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEV vs. ONEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEV vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEV achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 17.15% return.


FDEV

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
4.41%
6M
7.53%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*

ONEQ

1D
0.06%
1M
7.93%
YTD
17.15%
6M
16.35%
1Y
41.97%
3Y*
28.05%
5Y*
15.92%
10Y*
19.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEV vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
4.41%30.36%5.84%13.37%-16.54%11.00%5.49%10.06%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
17.15%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%21.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEV and ONEQ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.62

The correlation between FDEV and ONEQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDEV vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDEV
ONEQ

Financial Services

21.9%
3.1%

Industrials

15.9%
2.9%

Healthcare

13.3%
5.1%

Energy

10.8%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
5.2%

Utilities

8.1%
0.9%

Communication Services

7.2%
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
13.3%

Basic Materials

4.1%
1.0%

Technology

3.7%
50.8%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Financial Services

FDEV
21.9%
ONEQ
3.1%

Industrials

FDEV
15.9%
ONEQ
2.9%

Healthcare

FDEV
13.3%
ONEQ
5.1%

Energy

FDEV
10.8%
ONEQ
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

FDEV
9.5%
ONEQ
5.2%

Utilities

FDEV
8.1%
ONEQ
0.9%

Communication Services

FDEV
7.2%
ONEQ
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FDEV
4.5%
ONEQ
13.3%

Basic Materials

FDEV
4.1%
ONEQ
1.0%

Technology

FDEV
3.7%
ONEQ
50.8%

Real Estate

FDEV

-

ONEQ
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEV vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEV
FDEV Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEV vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDEVONEQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

2.63

-1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

3.42

-1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.45

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.41

-1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.99

13.50

-6.51

FDEV vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEV and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDEVONEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.63

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.72

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.65

-0.13

Drawdowns

FDEV vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEV drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEV and ONEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEVONEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-55.09%

+24.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-12.64%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.47%

-24.09%

+13.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-35.23%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

0.00%

-4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-7.96%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

3.19%

-0.98%

Volatility

FDEV vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) is 3.72%, while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that FDEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEVONEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

4.05%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

11.93%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.95%

16.03%

-4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

22.14%

-8.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.33%

21.71%

-6.38%

FDEV vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEV vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

FDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than ONEQ's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
2.81%2.86%2.99%2.80%2.65%2.81%1.88%2.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.66%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDEV and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEQ has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to FDEV (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEV dropped -30.11% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

On 5-year performance, ONEQ leads with 15.92% vs 7.33% for FDEV. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, FDEV has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 15.92% return vs 7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDEV.

FDEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.66% for ONEQ.

FDEV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. FDEV tracks Fidelity Targeted International Factor Index, while ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDEV and 0.21% for ONEQ.

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEV and ONEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer