FDEM vs. BKEM

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FDEM (Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF) and BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - FDEM tracks the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index while BKEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDEM returned 8.90%/yr vs 6.67%/yr for BKEM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDEM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BKEM.

Performance

FDEM vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 22.14% return.

FDEM

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: -3.09%
• 6M: 10.98%
• YTD: 16.33%
• 1Y: 29.47%
• 3Y*: 19.95%
• 5Y*: 8.90%
• 10Y*: —

BKEM

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: -3.22%
• 6M: 16.09%
• YTD: 22.14%
• 1Y: 38.83%
• 3Y*: 19.62%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEM vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF	16.33%	26.75%	9.34%	17.26%	-13.11%	-3.52%	36.84%
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	22.14%	30.55%	7.53%	8.68%	-19.43%	-3.91%	48.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEM and BKEM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020	0.90

The correlation between FDEM and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDEM vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDEM	BKEM
Technology	38.5%	43.0%
Financial Services	15.0%	16.9%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	8.7%
Communication Services	9.6%	5.8%
Energy	7.3%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	2.6%
Real Estate	4.6%	1.1%
Industrials	4.4%	8.1%
Basic Materials	2.7%	5.7%
Healthcare	-	2.7%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

FDEM vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEM

FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 54
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 58

BKEM

BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 67
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEM vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDEM	BKEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.70	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	2.22	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.32	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	2.98	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.13	10.09	-1.97

FDEM vs. BKEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the BKEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEM and BKEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDEM vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum BKEM drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and BKEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDEM	BKEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.65%	-39.48%	+5.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.70%	-13.11%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.04%	-18.38%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.34%	-33.89%	+7.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.49%	-7.51%	+1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.77%	-15.80%	+7.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.63%	3.86%	-0.23%

Volatility

FDEM vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) is 8.88%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 10.25%. This indicates that FDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDEM	BKEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.88%	10.25%	-1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.76%	20.99%	-2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.50%	22.93%	-2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.87%	19.51%	-2.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.28%	19.65%	-1.37%

FDEM vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDEM vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than BKEM's 1.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.92%	2.25%	2.76%	3.02%	3.15%	2.22%	1.78%	0.00%
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF	3.01%	3.23%	4.05%	4.41%	3.95%	2.71%	1.84%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDEM and BKEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FDEM and BKEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FDEM or BKEM?

BKEM has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to FDEM (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEM dropped -33.65% vs BKEM's -39.48%.

Which ETF is better, FDEM or BKEM?

On 5-year performance, FDEM leads with 8.90% vs 6.67% for BKEM. On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, FDEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDEM or BKEM?

Over the 5-year period, FDEM has performed better with a 8.90% return vs 6.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDEM or BKEM?

BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDEM or BKEM?

FDEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.92% for BKEM.

What is the main difference between FDEM and BKEM?

FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDEM and 0.11% for BKEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.