PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEM vs. DFEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEM vs. DFEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio (DFEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly lower than DFEMX's 17.07% return.


FDEM

1D
0.14%
1M
-1.28%
6M
6.08%
YTD
14.53%
1Y
28.23%
3Y*
18.72%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.19%

DFEMX

1D
3.65%
1M
-4.00%
6M
8.21%
YTD
17.07%
1Y
35.53%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
9.27%
ALL TIME*
7.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$2.80M$2.66M$4.40M

FDEM vs. DFEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
14.53%26.75%9.34%17.26%-13.11%-3.52%8.87%5.60%
DFEMX
DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio
17.07%33.57%6.90%13.08%-16.91%2.53%13.89%6.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEM and DFEMX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019

0.88

The correlation between FDEM and DFEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEM vs. DFEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDEM
FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEMX
DFEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDEM vs. DFEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio (DFEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDEMDFEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.33

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.60

7.75

-1.14

FDEM vs. DFEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the DFEMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEM and DFEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDEM vs. DFEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum DFEMX drawdown of -62.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and DFEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEMDFEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-62.43%

+28.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-14.29%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

-16.12%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.82%

-29.53%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.94%

-11.16%

+3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-15.29%

+6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

4.28%

-0.18%

Volatility

FDEM vs. DFEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) is 7.53%, while DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio (DFEMX) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that FDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEMDFEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

9.34%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.27%

20.34%

-1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.14%

21.83%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

16.81%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

17.01%

+1.31%

FDEM vs. DFEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEMX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEM vs. DFEMX - Dividend Comparison

FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than DFEMX's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFEMX
DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio
2.09%2.55%3.14%3.34%3.90%6.13%1.45%2.33%2.14%1.74%1.92%2.08%
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
3.05%3.23%4.05%4.41%3.95%2.71%1.84%2.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDEM and DFEMX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFEMX has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to FDEM (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEM dropped -33.65% vs DFEMX's -62.43%.

DFEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEM and DFEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer