FDEM vs. EMGF
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF).
FDEM and EMGF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDEM is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index. It was launched on Feb 26, 2019. EMGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2015. Both FDEM and EMGF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FDEM or EMGF.
Correlation
The correlation between FDEM and EMGF is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FDEM vs. EMGF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FDEM:
1.08
EMGF:
0.99
FDEM:
1.59
EMGF:
1.46
FDEM:
1.19
EMGF:
1.18
FDEM:
1.23
EMGF:
0.90
FDEM:
4.70
EMGF:
3.81
FDEM:
3.16%
EMGF:
3.95%
FDEM:
13.71%
EMGF:
15.21%
FDEM:
-33.65%
EMGF:
-40.23%
FDEM:
-5.86%
EMGF:
-8.75%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FDEM having a 10.90% return and EMGF slightly lower at 10.54%.
FDEM
10.90%
0.34%
1.94%
12.56%
3.52%
N/A
EMGF
10.54%
-0.41%
0.89%
12.91%
4.06%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDEM vs. EMGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FDEM and EMGF have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FDEM vs. EMGF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FDEM vs. EMGF - Dividend Comparison
FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than EMGF's 3.37% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 4.06% | 4.41% | 3.95% | 2.71% | 1.84% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 3.37% | 5.94% | 4.04% | 2.48% | 1.95% | 2.63% | 2.73% | 1.95% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
FDEM vs. EMGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum EMGF drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and EMGF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FDEM vs. EMGF - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) have volatilities of 3.90% and 3.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.