FDCF vs. FCOM
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM).
FDCF and FCOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDCF is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 16, 2020. FCOM is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013.
Performance
FDCF vs. FCOM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDCF vs. FCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF | -10.46% | 27.42% | 28.37% | 16.39% |
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | -6.81% | 26.06% | 33.05% | 13.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDCF achieves a -10.46% return, which is significantly lower than FCOM's -6.81% return.
FDCF
- 1D
- 4.40%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- -10.46%
- 6M
- -13.12%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCOM
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- -6.10%
- YTD
- -6.81%
- 6M
- -3.57%
- 1Y
- 22.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDCF vs. FCOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDCF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FCOM's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDCF vs. FCOM — Risk / Return Rank
FDCF
FCOM
FDCF vs. FCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDCF | FCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 1.10 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 1.71 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.23 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 1.69 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 6.27 | -3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDCF | FCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 1.10 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.55 | +0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDCF and FCOM is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDCF vs. FCOM - Dividend Comparison
FDCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FCOM's 1.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 1.00% | 0.88% | 0.87% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 11.70% | 2.27% | 2.92% |
Drawdowns
FDCF vs. FCOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDCF drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum FCOM drawdown of -46.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCF and FCOM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDCF | FCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.53% | -46.76% | +24.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.10% | -13.48% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.50% | -9.92% | -4.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -8.74% | +4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 3.63% | +2.17% |
Volatility
FDCF vs. FCOM - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) at 6.37%. This indicates that FDCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDCF | FCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 6.37% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.44% | 11.59% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.03% | 20.29% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 21.21% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 20.94% | -0.17% |