PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FDCF vs. QQQM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FDCF and QQQM is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

FDCF vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
9.28%
10.43%
FDCF
QQQM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FDCF:

1.68

QQQM:

1.72

Sortino Ratio

FDCF:

2.30

QQQM:

2.28

Omega Ratio

FDCF:

1.30

QQQM:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

FDCF:

2.29

QQQM:

2.27

Martin Ratio

FDCF:

8.33

QQQM:

8.17

Ulcer Index

FDCF:

3.83%

QQQM:

3.76%

Daily Std Dev

FDCF:

18.97%

QQQM:

17.85%

Max Drawdown

FDCF:

-14.27%

QQQM:

-35.05%

Current Drawdown

FDCF:

-3.03%

QQQM:

-1.35%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FDCF having a 31.65% return and QQQM slightly lower at 30.32%.


FDCF

YTD

31.65%

1M

-0.14%

6M

9.28%

1Y

31.29%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QQQM

YTD

30.32%

1M

4.97%

6M

10.94%

1Y

30.72%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDCF vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Expense ratio chart for FDCF: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%
Expense ratio chart for QQQM: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDCF vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FDCF, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.681.68
The chart of Sortino ratio for FDCF, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.302.24
The chart of Omega ratio for FDCF, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.301.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for FDCF, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.292.21
The chart of Martin ratio for FDCF, currently valued at 8.33, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.337.96
FDCF
QQQM

The current FDCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDCF and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.68
1.68
FDCF
QQQM

Dividends

FDCF vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

FDCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than QQQM's 0.58% yield.


TTM2023202220212020
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.58%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%

Drawdowns

FDCF vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDCF drawdown since its inception was -14.27%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCF and QQQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-3.03%
-1.35%
FDCF
QQQM

Volatility

FDCF vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) is 4.58%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that FDCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.58%
5.47%
FDCF
QQQM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab