FDCF vs. BNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX).
FDCF and BNDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDCF is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 16, 2020. BNDX is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). It was launched on May 31, 2013.
Performance
FDCF vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDCF vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF | -9.91% | 27.42% | 28.37% | 16.39% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 0.02% | 2.86% | 3.57% | 5.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDCF achieves a -9.91% return, which is significantly lower than BNDX's 0.02% return.
FDCF
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -9.91%
- 6M
- -12.31%
- 1Y
- 16.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 2.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.20%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDCF vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDCF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDCF vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank
FDCF
BNDX
FDCF vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDCF | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 0.85 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.19 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.01 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | 4.10 | -1.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDCF | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.85 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.61 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDCF and BNDX is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FDCF vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison
FDCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than BNDX's 4.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.46% | 4.39% | 4.18% | 4.42% | 1.51% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
FDCF vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDCF drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCF and BNDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDCF | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.53% | -16.23% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.10% | -2.93% | -15.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.97% | -1.99% | -11.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -3.10% | -1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.87% | 0.72% | +5.15% |
Volatility
FDCF vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.74%. This indicates that FDCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDCF | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 1.74% | +6.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.45% | 2.29% | +12.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.02% | 3.21% | +19.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 4.81% | +15.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 4.05% | +16.70% |