FCUS vs. JHMM
Compare and contrast key facts about Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM).
FCUS and JHMM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCUS is an actively managed fund by Pinnacle. It was launched on Dec 28, 2022. JHMM is a passively managed fund by Manulife that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2015.
Performance
FCUS vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCUS vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 17.00% | 13.69% | 30.59% | 21.13% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 3.12% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCUS achieves a 17.00% return, which is significantly higher than JHMM's 3.12% return.
FCUS
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- YTD
- 17.00%
- 6M
- 19.12%
- 1Y
- 64.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHMM
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 18.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCUS vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JHMM's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCUS vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank
FCUS
JHMM
FCUS vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCUS | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 0.96 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 1.46 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.20 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 1.40 | +2.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.53 | 6.22 | +6.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCUS | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 0.96 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.59 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCUS and JHMM is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCUS vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison
FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than JHMM's 0.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 3.70% | 4.33% | 11.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
Drawdowns
FCUS vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, roughly equal to the maximum JHMM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and JHMM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCUS | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.89% | -40.71% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -13.57% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.80% | -5.58% | -2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -5.50% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.36% | 3.06% | +2.30% |
Volatility
FCUS vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a higher volatility of 15.41% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) at 5.75%. This indicates that FCUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCUS | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.41% | 5.75% | +9.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.50% | 10.93% | +18.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.89% | 19.52% | +15.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.06% | 18.30% | +11.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.06% | 19.57% | +10.49% |