PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCTR vs. ROUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCTR vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTR achieves a 15.16% return, which is significantly lower than ROUS's 16.55% return.


FCTR

1D
-0.76%
1M
8.63%
YTD
15.16%
6M
15.25%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*

ROUS

1D
0.01%
1M
6.18%
YTD
16.55%
6M
16.75%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCTR vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
15.16%8.63%19.54%0.71%-20.42%21.13%30.17%30.91%-12.94%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
16.55%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-13.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTR and ROUS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.83

The correlation between FCTR and ROUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCTR vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCTR
ROUS

Technology

19.3%
33.2%

Financial Services

18.7%
10.6%

Healthcare

9.4%
10.7%

Industrials

9.4%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
5.8%

Real Estate

7.8%
2.1%

Energy

6.5%
3.0%

Basic Materials

4.6%
2.2%

Utilities

4.3%
3.8%

Communication Services

3.5%
8.6%

Technology

FCTR
19.3%
ROUS
33.2%

Financial Services

FCTR
18.7%
ROUS
10.6%

Healthcare

FCTR
9.4%
ROUS
10.7%

Industrials

FCTR
9.4%
ROUS
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FCTR
8.5%
ROUS
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

FCTR
8.1%
ROUS
5.8%

Real Estate

FCTR
7.8%
ROUS
2.1%

Energy

FCTR
6.5%
ROUS
3.0%

Basic Materials

FCTR
4.6%
ROUS
2.2%

Utilities

FCTR
4.3%
ROUS
3.8%

Communication Services

FCTR
3.5%
ROUS
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCTR vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTR
FCTR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTR vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCTRROUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.46

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

4.95

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.66

20.38

-12.71

FCTR vs. ROUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the ROUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTR and ROUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCTRROUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.60

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.90

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.67

-0.20

Drawdowns

FCTR vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTR drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, roughly equal to the maximum ROUS drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTR and ROUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCTRROUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

-35.51%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-5.97%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.63%

-15.81%

-6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.10%

-18.91%

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

0.00%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-4.24%

-6.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

1.45%

+1.60%

Volatility

FCTR vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.54%. This indicates that FCTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCTRROUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

2.54%

+4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

8.50%

+3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.53%

11.37%

+6.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.64%

14.38%

+5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

16.96%

+4.98%

FCTR vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCTR vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison

FCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than ROUS's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
0.35%0.30%0.82%1.04%1.38%0.46%0.44%0.98%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCTR and ROUS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCTR has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to ROUS (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTR dropped -37.10% vs ROUS's -35.51%.

On 5-year performance, ROUS leads with 12.84% vs 4.29% for FCTR. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 4.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FCTR.

ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.35% for FCTR.

FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FCTR and 0.19% for ROUS.

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCTR and ROUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer