FBY vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBY returned -17.63% vs 24.88% for QQQI. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

FBY vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 9.86% return.

FBY

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -7.14%
• YTD: -13.50%
• 6M: -13.67%
• 1Y: -17.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQI

• 1D: -2.87%
• 1M: -0.93%
• YTD: 9.86%
• 6M: 8.75%
• 1Y: 24.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBY vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	-13.50%	1.98%	33.85%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	9.86%	18.62%	19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FBY and QQQI is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.59

The correlation between FBY and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBY vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBY

FBY Risk / Return Rank: 4
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 53
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 52
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBY vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBY	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.60	1.69	-2.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.68	2.25	-2.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.32	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	2.60	-3.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	11.10	-12.33

FBY vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBY Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBY and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBY vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBY	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.53%	-20.00%	-11.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.50%	-9.61%	-19.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.66%	-3.32%	-22.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.09%	-2.20%	-5.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.46%	2.25%	+12.21%

Volatility

FBY vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) has a higher volatility of 10.24% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 7.63%. This indicates that FBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBY	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.24%	7.63%	+2.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.30%	11.99%	+11.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.60%	14.79%	+14.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.65%	17.53%	+11.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.65%	17.53%	+11.12%

FBY vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBY vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.98%, more than QQQI's 14.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	57.98%	55.43%	53.89%	8.31%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	14.97%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBY and QQQI in my portfolio?

FBY and QQQI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBY or QQQI?

FBY has higher volatility (10.24%) compared to QQQI (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBY dropped -31.53% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, FBY or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 24.88% vs -17.63% for FBY. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 7.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBY or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 24.88% return vs -17.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBY or QQQI?

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBY or QQQI?

FBY has the higher dividend yield at 57.98%, compared with 14.97% for QQQI.

What is the main difference between FBY and QQQI?

FBY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for FBY and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.