FBY vs. AMZY
FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) and AMZY (YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while AMZY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBY returned -10.52% vs 16.78% for AMZY. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
FBY vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a -9.36% return, which is significantly lower than AMZY's 6.01% return.
FBY
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -9.36%
- 6M
- -8.42%
- 1Y
- -10.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZY
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 6.01%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBY vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | -9.36% | 1.98% | 44.42% | 15.65% |
AMZY YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF | 6.01% | 10.39% | 35.28% | 15.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBY and AMZY is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FBY and AMZY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBY vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank
FBY
AMZY
FBY vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBY | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | 0.72 | -1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | 1.09 | -1.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.15 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 0.90 | -1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 2.25 | -2.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBY | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | 0.72 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.99 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
FBY vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, which is greater than AMZY's maximum drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and AMZY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBY | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -23.70% | -7.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.50% | -19.61% | -9.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.10% | -5.34% | -16.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -5.32% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.35% | 7.86% | +5.49% |
Volatility
FBY vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) at 5.75%. This indicates that FBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBY | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 5.75% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.94% | 15.91% | +6.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.73% | 23.48% | +5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.46% | 25.04% | +3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.46% | 25.04% | +3.42% |
FBY vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FBY and AMZY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
FBY vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison
FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.90%, more than AMZY's 56.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZY YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF | 56.39% | 52.59% | 47.91% | 9.90% |
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | 57.90% | 55.43% | 53.89% | 8.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBY and AMZY have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBY has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to AMZY (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBY dropped -31.53% vs AMZY's -23.70%.
On 1-year performance, AMZY leads with 16.78% vs -10.52% for FBY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AMZY has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMZY has performed better with a 16.78% return vs -10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBY and AMZY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
FBY has the higher dividend yield at 57.90%, compared with 56.39% for AMZY.
FBY is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMZY is Options Trading.
AMZY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBY and AMZY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer