PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBY vs. AMZY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBY vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF (FBY) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a -15.55% return, which is significantly lower than AMZY's 10.52% return.


FBY

1D
2.07%
1M
-4.56%
6M
-21.00%
YTD
-15.55%
1Y
-24.10%
3Y*
12.92%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.50%

AMZY

1D
12.51%
1M
10.78%
6M
8.94%
YTD
10.52%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.19M$2.74M$4.75M
$1.42M$1.53M$1.62M

FBY vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FBY
YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF
-15.55%1.98%44.42%17.68%
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
10.52%10.39%35.28%19.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FBY and AMZY is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2023

0.60

The correlation between FBY and AMZY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBY vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FBY
FBY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FBY vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF (FBY) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBYAMZYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.09

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

0.48

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.61

1.06

-2.67

FBY vs. AMZY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBY Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the AMZY Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBY and AMZY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBY vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, which is greater than AMZY's maximum drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and AMZY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBYAMZYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.53%

-23.70%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.50%

-19.61%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.53%

-23.70%

-7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.42%

-1.31%

-26.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-5.58%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.09%

8.94%

+7.15%

Volatility

FBY vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF (FBY) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) have volatilities of 13.27% and 13.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBYAMZYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.27%

13.48%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.65%

21.27%

+4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.93%

27.98%

+4.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.49%

26.08%

+3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.49%

26.08%

+3.41%

FBY vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZY's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBY vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison

FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.78%, more than AMZY's 46.74% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
46.74%52.59%47.91%9.90%
FBY
YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF
62.78%55.43%53.89%8.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBY and AMZY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZY has higher volatility (13.48%) compared to FBY (13.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBY dropped -31.53% vs AMZY's -23.70%.

On 3-year performance, AMZY leads with 24.27% vs 12.92% for FBY. On fees, FBY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, FBY has been the lower-risk option at 13.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AMZY has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 12.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZY.

FBY has the higher dividend yield at 62.78%, compared with 46.74% for AMZY.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for FBY and 1.09% for AMZY.

AMZY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBY and AMZY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer