PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FBY vs. META
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FBY and META is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

FBY vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
30.39%
26.37%
FBY
META

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FBY:

1.72

META:

1.76

Sortino Ratio

FBY:

2.29

META:

2.63

Omega Ratio

FBY:

1.34

META:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

FBY:

3.00

META:

3.50

Martin Ratio

FBY:

8.67

META:

10.59

Ulcer Index

FBY:

5.24%

META:

6.09%

Daily Std Dev

FBY:

26.35%

META:

36.78%

Max Drawdown

FBY:

-15.14%

META:

-76.74%

Current Drawdown

FBY:

-2.15%

META:

-2.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly lower than META's 5.29% return.


FBY

YTD

2.77%

1M

3.32%

6M

30.39%

1Y

43.74%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

META

YTD

5.29%

1M

5.33%

6M

26.37%

1Y

62.09%

5Y*

23.11%

10Y*

23.11%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBY vs. META — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBY is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBY is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBY is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBY is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBY is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBY is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

META
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of META is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of META is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of META is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of META is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of META is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of META is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FBY vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBY, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.721.76
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBY, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.292.63
The chart of Omega ratio for FBY, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.341.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBY, currently valued at 3.00, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.003.50
The chart of Martin ratio for FBY, currently valued at 8.67, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.6710.59
FBY
META

The current FBY Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the META Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBY and META, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.72
1.76
FBY
META

Dividends

FBY vs. META - Dividend Comparison

FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.84%, more than META's 0.32% yield.


TTM20242023
FBY
YieldMax META Option Income ETF
50.84%53.90%8.31%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.32%0.34%0.00%

Drawdowns

FBY vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -15.14%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and META. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-2.15%
-2.49%
FBY
META

Volatility

FBY vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) is 7.01%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that FBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.01%
9.17%
FBY
META
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab