FBY vs. MSTY
FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBY returned -17.63% vs -66.58% for MSTY. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
FBY vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -27.80% return.
FBY
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -7.14%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -13.67%
- 1Y
- -17.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -31.74%
- YTD
- -27.80%
- 6M
- -29.80%
- 1Y
- -66.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBY vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | -13.50% | 1.98% | 26.26% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -27.80% | -42.71% | 212.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBY and MSTY is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBY vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
FBY
MSTY
FBY vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.79 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | -0.93 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | -1.35 | +0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBY vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -71.79% | +40.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.50% | -71.79% | +42.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.66% | -71.62% | +45.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -26.97% | +18.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.46% | 49.36% | -34.90% |
Volatility
FBY vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) is 10.24%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 19.32%. This indicates that FBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.24% | 19.32% | -9.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.30% | 49.66% | -26.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.60% | 62.02% | -32.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.65% | 71.82% | -43.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.65% | 71.82% | -43.17% |
FBY vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FBY and MSTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
FBY vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.95%, less than MSTY's 286.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | 57.98% | 55.43% | 53.89% | 8.31% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 286.06% | 294.61% | 104.56% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBY and MSTY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (19.32%) compared to FBY (10.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBY dropped -31.53% vs MSTY's -71.79%.
On 1-year performance, FBY leads with -17.63% vs -66.58% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, FBY has been the lower-risk option at 10.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FBY has performed better with a -17.63% return vs -66.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBY and MSTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 286.06%, compared with 57.98% for FBY.
FBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBY and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer