FBTC.TO vs. BCCC
FBTC.TO (Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF) and BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBTC.TO returned -41.41% vs -30.26% for BCCC. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBTC.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCCC.
Performance
FBTC.TO vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FBTC.TO is traded in CAD, while BCCC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCCC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTC.TO achieves a -29.14% return, which is significantly lower than BCCC's -23.66% return.
FBTC.TO
- 1D
- -3.77%
- 1M
- -20.17%
- YTD
- -29.14%
- 6M
- -28.64%
- 1Y
- -41.41%
- 3Y*
- 26.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCCC
- 1D
- -3.55%
- 1M
- -15.23%
- YTD
- -23.66%
- 6M
- -22.75%
- 1Y
- -30.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBTC.TO vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBTC.TO Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF | -29.14% | -17.93% |
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -23.66% | -7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTC.TO and BCCC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FBTC.TO and BCCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBTC.TO vs. BCCC — Risk / Return Rank
FBTC.TO
BCCC
FBTC.TO vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBTC.TO | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.86 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.71 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | -1.28 | -0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBTC.TO vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTC.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.77%, which is greater than BCCC's maximum drawdown of -42.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC.TO and BCCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTC.TO | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.77% | -42.86% | -27.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.26% | -42.86% | -9.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.62% | -40.17% | -11.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.16% | -18.38% | -12.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.58% | 23.66% | +7.92% |
Volatility
FBTC.TO vs. BCCC - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.31% compared to Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) at 10.91%. This indicates that FBTC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBTC.TO | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.31% | 10.91% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.64% | 28.98% | +4.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.56% | 35.80% | +7.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.28% | 35.50% | +16.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.28% | 35.50% | +16.78% |
FBTC.TO vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBTC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBTC.TO vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison
FBTC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 66.44% | 29.55% |
FBTC.TO Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FBTC.TO and BCCC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FBTC.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBTC.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCCC.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FBTC.TO and 0.75% for BCCC.
Find the right allocation for FBTC.TO and BCCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer