PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTC.TO vs. FCCQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBTC.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBTC.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
-21.31%-10.85%137.16%145.80%-61.34%-20.88%
FCCQ.TO
Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF
2.76%31.01%21.58%11.02%-7.52%2.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC.TO achieves a -21.31% return, which is significantly lower than FCCQ.TO's 2.76% return.


FBTC.TO

1D
0.39%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
-21.31%
6M
-42.50%
1Y
-22.45%
3Y*
33.42%
5Y*
10Y*

FCCQ.TO

1D
2.44%
1M
-6.06%
YTD
2.76%
6M
10.61%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBTC.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FCCQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FBTC.TO vs. FCCQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC.TO
FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FCCQ.TO
FCCQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FCCQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCCQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCCQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FCCQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCCQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTC.TOFCCQ.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.50

2.06

-2.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.48

2.61

-3.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.41

-0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

3.03

-3.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.86

12.74

-13.59

FBTC.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the FCCQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC.TO and FCCQ.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTC.TOFCCQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

2.06

-2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.79

-0.68

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC.TO and FCCQ.TO is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FBTC.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

FBTC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCCQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCCQ.TO
Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF
1.53%1.45%1.83%2.40%2.31%1.90%2.10%2.30%

Drawdowns

FBTC.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.77%, which is greater than FCCQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC.TO and FCCQ.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTC.TOFCCQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.77%

-35.31%

-35.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.22%

-11.59%

-38.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.28%

-6.21%

-40.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.54%

-4.01%

-26.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.90%

2.76%

+21.14%

Volatility

FBTC.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.86% compared to Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) at 6.71%. This indicates that FBTC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCCQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBTC.TOFCCQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.86%

6.71%

+6.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.25%

12.48%

+23.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.79%

16.62%

+28.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.97%

13.56%

+39.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.97%

16.09%

+36.88%