FBTC.TO vs. WGMI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI).

FBTC.TO and WGMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBTC.TO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 30, 2021. WGMI is an actively managed fund by Valkyrie. It was launched on Feb 7, 2022.

Performance

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FBTC.TO Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF	-21.62%	-10.85%	137.16%	145.80%	-59.14%
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	-7.78%	64.55%	34.15%	295.18%	-82.38%

Different Trading Currencies

FBTC.TO is traded in CAD, while WGMI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WGMI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC.TO achieves a -21.62% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's -7.78% return.

FBTC.TO

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: -21.62%
• 6M: -40.83%
• 1Y: -20.77%
• 3Y*: 33.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WGMI

• 1D: 7.58%
• 1M: -10.96%
• YTD: -7.78%
• 6M: -21.36%
• 1Y: 163.59%
• 3Y*: 57.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.

WGMI

Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF

FBTC.TO

Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF

Return for Risk

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC.TO

FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 86
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 82
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBTC.TO	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	2.12	-2.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.41	2.54	-2.95
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.30	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	3.07	-3.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.91	6.60	-7.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the WGMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC.TO and WGMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBTC.TO	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47	2.12	-2.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.11	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC.TO and WGMI is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBTC.TO nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBTC.TO Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Drawdowns

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.77%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -84.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC.TO and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBTC.TO	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.77%	-85.76%	+14.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.22%	-50.94%	+0.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.48%	-47.16%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.53%	-43.86%	+13.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.72%	23.18%	+0.54%

Volatility

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) is 13.01%, while Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 23.82%. This indicates that FBTC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBTC.TO	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.01%	23.82%	-10.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.24%	60.63%	-24.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.80%	77.63%	-32.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.99%	80.36%	-27.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.99%	80.36%	-27.37%