PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTC.TO vs. WGMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FBTC.TO is traded in CAD, while WGMI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WGMI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC.TO achieves a -24.39% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 87.13% return.


FBTC.TO

1D
-2.22%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-24.39%
6M
-30.03%
1Y
-37.95%
3Y*
34.59%
5Y*
10Y*

WGMI

1D
-0.71%
1M
42.83%
YTD
87.13%
6M
54.92%
1Y
299.71%
3Y*
88.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
-24.39%-10.85%137.16%145.80%-59.14%
WGMI
Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF
87.13%64.55%34.15%295.18%-82.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC.TO and WGMI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022

0.62

The correlation between FBTC.TO and WGMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC.TO
FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

WGMI
WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTC.TOWGMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.43

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

5.88

-6.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

11.62

-12.92

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the WGMI Sharpe Ratio of 4.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC.TO and WGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTC.TOWGMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

4.01

-4.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.35

-0.27

Drawdowns

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.77%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -84.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC.TO and WGMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTC.TOWGMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.77%

-84.71%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.22%

-51.35%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.22%

-62.81%

+12.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.38%

-0.71%

-47.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-41.52%

+10.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.18%

25.93%

+3.25%

Volatility

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) is 9.72%, while Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 20.02%. This indicates that FBTC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBTC.TOWGMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.72%

20.02%

-10.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.63%

55.12%

-21.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.84%

75.36%

-32.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.37%

79.82%

-27.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.37%

79.82%

-27.45%

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBTC.TO vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBTC.TO nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WGMI
Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF
0.00%0.00%0.22%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBTC.TO and WGMI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FBTC.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBTC.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Valkyrie. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FBTC.TO and 0.75% for WGMI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBTC.TO and WGMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer