PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTC.TO vs. BTCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBTC.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBTC.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
-21.62%-10.85%137.16%145.80%-61.34%-20.88%
BTCC.TO
Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units
-23.52%-9.18%116.50%149.22%-65.78%-19.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC.TO achieves a -21.62% return, which is significantly higher than BTCC.TO's -23.52% return.


FBTC.TO

1D
1.70%
1M
5.18%
YTD
-21.62%
6M
-40.83%
1Y
-20.77%
3Y*
33.25%
5Y*
10Y*

BTCC.TO

1D
2.04%
1M
2.95%
YTD
-23.52%
6M
-41.91%
1Y
-20.75%
3Y*
29.73%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBTC.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCC.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FBTC.TO vs. BTCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC.TO
FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCC.TO
BTCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTC.TOBTCC.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.47

-0.46

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.41

-0.41

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.95

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

-0.44

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.91

-0.94

+0.02

FBTC.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is comparable to the BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC.TO and BTCC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTC.TOBTCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

-0.46

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.06

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC.TO and BTCC.TO is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FBTC.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBTC.TO nor BTCC.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FBTC.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.77%, smaller than the maximum BTCC.TO drawdown of -77.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC.TO and BTCC.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTC.TOBTCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.77%

-77.80%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.22%

-50.04%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.48%

-47.05%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.53%

-34.40%

+3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.72%

23.49%

+0.23%

Volatility

FBTC.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) have volatilities of 13.01% and 12.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBTC.TOBTCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.01%

12.86%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.24%

36.59%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.80%

44.86%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.99%

56.97%

-3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.99%

57.43%

-4.44%