BCCC vs. HOOW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW).

BCCC and HOOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCCC is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jun 3, 2025. HOOW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 18, 2025.

Performance

BCCC vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BCCC vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	-18.37%	-7.14%
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	-45.24%	46.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCCC achieves a -18.37% return, which is significantly higher than HOOW's -45.24% return.

BCCC

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: -18.37%
• 6M: -31.34%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOW

• 1D: 8.54%
• 1M: -10.44%
• YTD: -45.24%
• 6M: -59.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCCC vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCCC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.

HOOW

Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF

BCCC

Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF

Return for Risk

BCCC vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCCC	HOOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.79	-0.30	-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between BCCC and HOOW is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BCCC vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison

BCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.39%, less than HOOW's 166.30% yield.

	TTM	2025
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	51.39%	29.55%
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	166.30%	67.92%

Drawdowns

BCCC vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCCC drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, smaller than the maximum HOOW drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCC and HOOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCCC	HOOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.62%	-65.74%	+24.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.76%	-62.81%	+28.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.24%	-22.86%	+8.62%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCCC	HOOW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.66%	82.50%	-45.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.66%	82.50%	-45.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.66%	82.50%	-45.84%