BCCC vs. BTCI

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCCC returned -33.62% vs -40.21% for BTCI. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. BCCC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.

Performance

BCCC vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCCC achieves a -21.48% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -25.73% return.

BCCC

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: 3.84%
• 6M: -17.95%
• YTD: -21.48%
• 1Y: -33.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -23.83%

BTCI

• 1D: -2.39%
• 1M: 2.51%
• 6M: -23.02%
• YTD: -25.73%
• 1Y: -40.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -4.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	$106.40K	$112.45K	$168.80K
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	$12.53M	$12.80M	$22.67M

BCCC vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	-21.48%	-7.02%
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-25.73%	-13.84%

Correlation

The correlation between BCCC and BTCI is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	0.98

The correlation between BCCC and BTCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BCCC vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCCC

BCCC Risk / Return Rank: 2
BCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 1
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCCC vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCCC	BTCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	-1.05	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.28	-1.53	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	0.83	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	-0.87	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	-1.36	+0.05

BCCC vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is comparable to the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCCC and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCCC vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCCC drawdown since its inception was -41.79%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -48.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCC and BTCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCCC	BTCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.79%	-48.42%	+6.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.79%	-48.42%	+6.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.24%	-45.08%	+7.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.75%	-17.81%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.06%	30.79%	-4.73%

Volatility

BCCC vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) is 6.30%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that BCCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCCC	BTCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.30%	7.31%	-1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.44%	30.70%	-2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.68%	40.00%	-4.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.23%	39.67%	-5.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.23%	39.67%	-5.44%

BCCC vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCCC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCCC vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

BCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.09%, more than BTCI's 41.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	59.09%	29.55%	0.00%
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	41.26%	36.46%	6.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCCC and BTCI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, BCCC and BTCI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BCCC or BTCI?

BTCI has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to BCCC (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCCC dropped -41.79% vs BTCI's -48.42%.

Which ETF is better, BCCC or BTCI?

On 1-year performance, BCCC leads with -33.62% vs -40.21% for BTCI. On fees, BCCC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BCCC has been the lower-risk option at 6.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCCC or BTCI?

Over the 1-year period, BCCC has performed better with a -33.62% return vs -40.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCCC or BTCI?

BCCC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCCC or BTCI?

BCCC has the higher dividend yield at 59.09%, compared with 41.26% for BTCI.

What is the main difference between BCCC and BTCI?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCCC and 0.99% for BTCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.96 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.