BCCC vs. PLTW
BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCCC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Global X, while PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCCC returned -33.62% vs -30.37% for PLTW. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BCCC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.
Performance
BCCC vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCCC achieves a -21.48% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -38.54% return.
BCCC
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- 6M
- -17.95%
- YTD
- -21.48%
- 1Y
- -33.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -23.83%
PLTW
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- 6M
- -21.93%
- YTD
- -38.54%
- 1Y
- -30.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -15.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $106.40K | $112.45K | $168.80K | |
| $2.46M | $2.75M | $3.76M |
BCCC vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -21.48% | -7.02% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -38.54% | 34.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCCC and PLTW is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCCC vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank
BCCC
PLTW
BCCC vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCCC | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.95 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.56 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | -1.02 | -0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCCC vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCCC drawdown since its inception was -41.79%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCC and PLTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCCC | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.79% | -57.27% | +15.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.79% | -57.27% | +15.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.24% | -49.73% | +12.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.75% | -25.20% | +5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.06% | 31.48% | -5.42% |
Volatility
BCCC vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) is 6.30%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 15.73%. This indicates that BCCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCCC | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 15.73% | -9.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.44% | 48.95% | -20.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.68% | 62.54% | -26.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.23% | 73.53% | -39.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.23% | 73.53% | -39.30% |
BCCC vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCCC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCCC vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison
BCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.09%, less than PLTW's 138.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 59.09% | 29.55% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 138.40% | 72.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCCC and PLTW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTW has higher volatility (15.73%) compared to BCCC (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCCC dropped -41.79% vs PLTW's -57.27%.
On 1-year performance, PLTW leads with -30.37% vs -33.62% for BCCC. On fees, BCCC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BCCC has been the lower-risk option at 6.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PLTW has performed better with a -30.37% return vs -33.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BCCC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.
PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 138.40%, compared with 59.09% for BCCC.
BCCC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while PLTW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCCC and 0.99% for PLTW.
PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCCC and PLTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer