FBL vs. XLE

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. FBL is actively managed, while XLE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FBL returned 29.09%/yr vs 15.59%/yr for XLE. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. FBL charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.

Performance

FBL vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a -12.40% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.29% return.

FBL

• 1D: -5.07%
• 1M: 18.52%
• 6M: -0.45%
• YTD: -12.40%
• 1Y: -29.49%
• 3Y*: 29.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLE

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 3.74%
• 6M: 21.42%
• YTD: 29.29%
• 1Y: 36.53%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 22.95%
• 10Y*: 9.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBL vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	-12.40%	0.50%	112.72%	341.59%	-1.38%
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	29.29%	7.88%	5.56%	-0.63%	4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FBL and XLE is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022	-0.01

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FBL and XLE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.22, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

FBL vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FBL	XLE
Communication Services	66.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FBL vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBL

FBL Risk / Return Rank: 6
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 6

XLE

XLE Risk / Return Rank: 59
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 57
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBL vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBL	XLE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	1.75	-2.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.10	2.32	-2.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.29	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.48	2.45	-2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	6.58	-7.37

FBL vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBL Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBL and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBL vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and XLE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBL	XLE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.15%	-71.26%	+10.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.03%	-14.98%	-46.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.15%	-20.14%	-41.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.22%	-8.20%	-35.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.57%	-17.95%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.33%	5.57%	+31.76%

Volatility

FBL vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a higher volatility of 31.69% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 6.10%. This indicates that FBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBL	XLE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.69%	6.10%	+25.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.20%	16.65%	+45.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.33%	20.96%	+56.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.36%	25.87%	+46.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.36%	29.58%	+42.78%

FBL vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBL has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBL vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than XLE's 2.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	2.37%	2.07%	0.00%	51.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.66%	3.28%	3.36%	3.55%	3.68%	4.21%	5.62%	6.72%	3.54%	3.03%	2.26%	3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBL and XLE in my portfolio?

FBL and XLE have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBL or XLE?

FBL has higher volatility (31.69%) compared to XLE (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBL dropped -61.15% vs XLE's -71.26%.

Which ETF is better, FBL or XLE?

On 3-year performance, FBL leads with 29.09% vs 15.59% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBL or XLE?

Over the 3-year period, FBL has performed better with a 29.09% return vs 15.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBL or XLE?

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for FBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBL or XLE?

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.37% for FBL.

What is the main difference between FBL and XLE?

FBL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for FBL and 0.08% for XLE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.