PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBGX vs. AMNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBGX vs. AMNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FBGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMNA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGX vs. AMNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


20242023202220212020
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
35.73%83.74%-56.41%57.04%54.04%
AMNA
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN
44.30%12.50%20.41%36.44%2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FBGX and AMNA is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between FBGX and AMNA has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FBGX vs. AMNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FBGX
AMNA

Basic Materials

0.0%
0.0%

Communication Services

0.0%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
0.0%

Energy

0.0%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.0%

Healthcare

0.0%
0.0%

Industrials

0.0%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.0%

Technology

0.0%
0.0%

Utilities

0.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

FBGX
0.0%
AMNA
0.0%

Communication Services

FBGX
0.0%
AMNA
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FBGX
0.0%
AMNA
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

FBGX
0.0%
AMNA
0.0%

Energy

FBGX
0.0%
AMNA
0.0%

Financial Services

FBGX
0.0%
AMNA
0.0%

Healthcare

FBGX
0.0%
AMNA
0.0%

Industrials

FBGX
0.0%
AMNA
0.0%

Real Estate

FBGX
0.0%
AMNA
0.0%

Technology

FBGX
0.0%
AMNA
0.0%

Utilities

FBGX
0.0%
AMNA
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBGX vs. AMNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBGX vs. AMNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBGX vs. AMNA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility

FBGX vs. AMNA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

FBGX vs. AMNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AMNA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBGX vs. AMNA - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBGX nor AMNA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2023202220212020
AMNA
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN
0.00%5.61%5.48%5.84%2.12%
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBGX and AMNA have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMNA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMNA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.

FBGX and AMNA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

FBGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMNA is MLPs. FBGX tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%), while AMNA tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for FBGX and 0.75% for AMNA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBGX and AMNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer