FBGX vs. AMNA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA).

FBGX and AMNA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBGX is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 11, 2014. AMNA is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2020. Both FBGX and AMNA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FBGX vs. AMNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBGX vs. AMNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	35.73%	83.74%	-56.41%	57.04%	54.04%
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN	44.30%	12.50%	20.41%	36.44%	2.88%

Returns By Period

FBGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMNA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGX vs. AMNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AMNA's 0.75% expense ratio.

FBGX

UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN

AMNA

ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN

Return for Risk

FBGX vs. AMNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Correlation

The correlation between FBGX and AMNA is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FBGX vs. AMNA - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBGX nor AMNA has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN	0.00%	5.61%	5.48%	5.84%	2.12%

Drawdowns

Volatility