PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBAOX vs. PALDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBAOX achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than PALDX's 7.89% return.


FBAOX

1D
0.20%
1M
4.01%
YTD
10.13%
6M
10.35%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PALDX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.48%
YTD
7.89%
6M
8.39%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FBAOX
Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A
10.13%14.81%4.65%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
7.89%13.62%3.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FBAOX and PALDX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.97

The correlation between FBAOX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBAOX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBAOX
FBAOX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FBAOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBAOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBAOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FBAOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBAOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PALDX
PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBAOXPALDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.52

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

3.62

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.55

17.16

+1.40

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBAOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBAOX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBAOXPALDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

2.73

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

0.81

+0.79

Drawdowns

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBAOX drawdown since its inception was -12.61%, smaller than the maximum PALDX drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAOX and PALDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBAOXPALDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.61%

-26.16%

+13.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.48%

-5.96%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-4.09%

+2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

1.25%

+0.10%

Volatility

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) at 2.30%. This indicates that FBAOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBAOXPALDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.30%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.80%

6.18%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.57%

7.89%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.51%

12.11%

-0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.51%

12.69%

-1.18%

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBAOX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

FBAOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than PALDX's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBAOX
Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A
4.88%5.40%6.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
5.02%5.42%10.40%2.94%6.19%6.87%2.58%4.58%3.65%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FBAOX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FBAOX has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to PALDX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAOX dropped -12.61% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

FBAOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBAOX and PALDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer