FBAOX vs. PALDX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX).

FBAOX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 6, 1986. PALDX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017.

Performance

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBAOX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A	-3.80%	14.81%	4.65%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	-3.62%	13.62%	3.24%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FBAOX having a -3.80% return and PALDX slightly higher at -3.62%.

FBAOX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -5.82%
• YTD: -3.80%
• 6M: -1.06%
• 1Y: 13.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PALDX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -5.44%
• YTD: -3.62%
• 6M: -1.03%
• 1Y: 12.43%
• 3Y*: 13.72%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBAOX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.

FBAOX

Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A

PALDX

PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund

Return for Risk

FBAOX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBAOX

FBAOX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FBAOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FBAOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FBAOX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FBAOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FBAOX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 66
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBAOX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	1.12	+0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.65	+0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.25	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	1.42	+0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.34	6.83	+0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBAOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBAOX and PALDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBAOX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	1.12	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.71	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between FBAOX and PALDX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

FBAOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, which matches PALDX's 5.62% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBAOX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A	5.61%	5.40%	6.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.62%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%

Drawdowns

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBAOX drawdown since its inception was -12.61%, smaller than the maximum PALDX drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAOX and PALDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBAOX	PALDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.61%	-26.16%	+13.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.15%	-8.20%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.48%	-5.96%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.55%	-4.16%	+2.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	1.70%	+0.05%

Volatility

FBAOX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) at 3.05%. This indicates that FBAOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBAOX	PALDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	3.05%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.45%	5.86%	+0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.75%	11.52%	+0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.62%	12.08%	-0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.62%	12.75%	-1.13%