FBAOX vs. FYMIX
FBAOX (Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A) and FYMIX (Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Fidelity. Over the past year, FBAOX returned 24.56% vs 24.61% for FYMIX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBAOX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FYMIX.
Performance
FBAOX vs. FYMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FBAOX having a 10.13% return and FYMIX slightly higher at 10.14%.
FBAOX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYMIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 10.14%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBAOX vs. FYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBAOX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A | 10.13% | 14.81% | 4.65% |
FYMIX Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund | 10.14% | 18.95% | -2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBAOX and FYMIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FBAOX and FYMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBAOX vs. FYMIX — Risk / Return Rank
FBAOX
FYMIX
FBAOX vs. FYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBAOX | FYMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.43 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 2.82 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.55 | 12.21 | +6.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBAOX | FYMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93 | 2.30 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 0.68 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
FBAOX vs. FYMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBAOX drawdown since its inception was -12.61%, smaller than the maximum FYMIX drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAOX and FYMIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBAOX | FYMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.61% | -22.70% | +10.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.48% | -8.80% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -5.64% | +4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 2.03% | -0.68% |
Volatility
FBAOX vs. FYMIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) is 2.59%, while Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that FBAOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBAOX | FYMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 3.55% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.80% | 8.85% | -2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.57% | 10.78% | -2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 12.73% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 12.73% | -1.22% |
FBAOX vs. FYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBAOX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FYMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBAOX vs. FYMIX - Dividend Comparison
FBAOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than FYMIX's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBAOX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A | 4.88% | 5.40% | 6.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FYMIX Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund | 3.35% | 3.69% | 1.84% | 1.78% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FBAOX and FYMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FYMIX has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to FBAOX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAOX dropped -12.61% vs FYMIX's -22.70%.
FBAOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBAOX and FYMIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer