FASGX vs. AOR
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR).
FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991. AOR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Performance
FASGX vs. AOR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FASGX vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | -1.02% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 11.19% | 11.42% | 18.91% | -5.82% | 15.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASGX achieves a -2.99% return, which is significantly lower than AOR's -1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FASGX has outperformed AOR with an annualized return of 8.70%, while AOR has yielded a comparatively lower 7.74% annualized return.
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
AOR
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 14.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FASGX vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASGX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FASGX vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank
FASGX
AOR
FASGX vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FASGX | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.99 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.97 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.89 | 8.58 | -1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FASGX | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.57 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.73 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.65 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FASGX and AOR is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FASGX vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison
FASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than AOR's 2.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 2.57% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
Drawdowns
FASGX vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASGX drawdown since its inception was -47.35%, which is greater than AOR's maximum drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASGX and AOR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASGX | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.35% | -24.44% | -22.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.07% | -7.62% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.54% | -21.72% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.20% | -22.95% | -4.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.95% | -4.82% | -3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.74% | -3.50% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.75% | +0.29% |
Volatility
FASGX vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) at 4.35%. This indicates that FASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FASGX | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 4.35% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 6.49% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 10.73% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.14% | 10.49% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 10.64% | +1.92% |