FASGX vs. BAC

In the year-to-date period, FASGX achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FASGX has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 7.38%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FASGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASGX and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than BAC's 2.31% yield.

The maximum FASGX drawdown since its inception was -47.29%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASGX and BAC.

The current volatility for Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) is 2.55%, while Bank of America Corporation (BAC) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that FASGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.