PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAB vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAB vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAB achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


FAB

1D
-0.79%
1M
0.77%
YTD
10.72%
6M
11.08%
1Y
26.09%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
10.39%

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAB vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
10.72%9.86%7.82%15.81%-6.79%30.83%2.40%23.73%-9.68%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FAB and KNG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.85

The correlation between FAB and KNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAB vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAB
KNG

Financial Services

23.9%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
5.5%

Industrials

12.0%
20.3%

Energy

8.3%
3.0%

Technology

7.9%
4.3%

Real Estate

7.7%
4.4%

Healthcare

7.1%
10.1%

Utilities

6.2%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
23.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
10.2%

Communication Services

2.7%

-

Financial Services

FAB
23.9%
KNG
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FAB
13.9%
KNG
5.5%

Industrials

FAB
12.0%
KNG
20.3%

Energy

FAB
8.3%
KNG
3.0%

Technology

FAB
7.9%
KNG
4.3%

Real Estate

FAB
7.7%
KNG
4.4%

Healthcare

FAB
7.1%
KNG
10.1%

Utilities

FAB
6.2%
KNG
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

FAB
5.9%
KNG
23.5%

Basic Materials

FAB
3.9%
KNG
10.2%

Communication Services

FAB
2.7%
KNG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAB vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAB
FAB Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAB vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FABKNGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

0.73

+1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.92

1.15

+1.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.13

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

0.87

+3.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.25

2.25

+10.00

FAB vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAB and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FABKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.73

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.32

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.49

-0.15

Drawdowns

FAB vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAB drawdown since its inception was -63.29%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAB and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FABKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.29%

-35.12%

-28.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.65%

-8.61%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.91%

-14.24%

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-18.20%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-5.89%

+4.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-4.13%

-5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

3.32%

-1.18%

Volatility

FAB vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that FAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FABKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

2.29%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

7.39%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.81%

10.19%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.72%

13.59%

+5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

17.18%

+4.88%

FAB vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAB has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAB vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

FAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.59%1.57%2.00%1.94%1.80%1.32%1.59%1.75%1.96%1.42%1.40%1.62%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAB and KNG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAB has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAB dropped -63.29% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, FAB leads with 7.87% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, FAB is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FAB has performed better with a 7.87% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FAB is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 1.59% for FAB.

FAB is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while KNG is Dividend. FAB tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FAB and 0.75% for KNG.

FAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAB and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer