F vs. PAA
F (Ford Motor Company) and PAA (Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.) are both stocks. F operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while PAA operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, F returned 6.42%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for PAA. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
F vs. PAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, F achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly lower than PAA's 30.01% return. Over the past 10 years, F has outperformed PAA with an annualized return of 6.42%, while PAA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.97% annualized return.
F
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 10.75%
- YTD
- 15.78%
- 6M
- 10.39%
- 1Y
- 49.30%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
PAA
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 30.01%
- 6M
- 31.47%
- 1Y
- 35.06%
- 3Y*
- 28.99%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 5.97%
F vs. PAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F Ford Motor Company | 15.78% | 42.35% | -13.10% | 10.18% | -42.18% | 137.48% | -3.88% | 29.64% | -34.35% | 8.73% |
PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. | 30.01% | 14.30% | 21.38% | 39.18% | 35.79% | 22.24% | -50.79% | -2.28% | 2.31% | -31.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between F and PAA is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 1998 | 0.24 |
The correlation between F and PAA shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
F:
$60.41B
PAA:
$15.84B
F:
-$1.52
PAA:
$2.19
F:
0.31
PAA:
0.35
F:
1.61
PAA:
1.24
F:
$189.86B
PAA:
$45.25B
F:
$17.42B
PAA:
$1.55B
F:
$9.99B
PAA:
$2.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
F vs. PAA — Risk / Return Rank
F
PAA
F vs. PAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ford Motor Company (F) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| F | PAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.33 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 2.51 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.55 | 7.17 | -1.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
F vs. PAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum F drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than PAA's maximum drawdown of -91.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for F and PAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| F | PAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | -91.99% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.31% | -14.53% | -7.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.51% | -22.26% | -14.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.62% | -25.01% | -33.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.77% | -87.92% | +23.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.52% | -10.03% | -24.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.70% | -25.75% | -18.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.65% | 5.08% | +3.57% |
Volatility
F vs. PAA - Volatility Comparison
Ford Motor Company (F) has a higher volatility of 18.96% compared to Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) at 7.32%. This indicates that F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| F | PAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.96% | 7.32% | +11.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.63% | 14.09% | +15.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.44% | 18.47% | +18.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.44% | 26.81% | +12.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.50% | 41.82% | -4.32% |
Dividends
F vs. PAA - Dividend Comparison
F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than PAA's 7.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F Ford Motor Company | 4.04% | 5.72% | 7.88% | 4.92% | 4.30% | 0.48% | 1.71% | 6.45% | 9.54% | 5.20% | 7.01% | 4.26% |
PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. | 7.11% | 8.46% | 7.44% | 7.06% | 7.08% | 7.71% | 10.92% | 7.50% | 5.99% | 9.45% | 8.21% | 11.93% |
Financials
F vs. PAA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ford Motor Company and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
F vs. PAA - Profitability Comparison
F - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 7.94B and revenue of 43.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.
PAA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
F - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
PAA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported an operating income of 405.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
F - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
PAA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a net income of 551.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
F and PAA have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
F has higher volatility (18.96%) compared to PAA (7.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, F dropped -97.07% vs PAA's -91.99%.
PAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for F and PAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer