EZPZ vs. FLKR

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZPZ is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while FLKR is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZPZ returned -45.45% vs 135.83% for FLKR. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

EZPZ vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -28.79% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 74.91% return.

EZPZ

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 1.27%
• 6M: -13.59%
• YTD: -28.79%
• 1Y: -45.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.43%

FLKR

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -10.53%
• 6M: 42.86%
• YTD: 74.91%
• 1Y: 135.83%
• 3Y*: 41.28%
• 5Y*: 15.50%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	$92.79K	$145.26K	$218.28K
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	$58.81M	$52.63M	$54.36M

EZPZ vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-28.79%	-10.11%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	74.91%	68.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EZPZ and FLKR is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

EZPZ vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 85
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EZPZ vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZPZ	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	2.55	-3.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.40	2.80	-4.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.39	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	4.00	-4.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	13.70	-14.92

EZPZ vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZPZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZPZ and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZPZ vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -56.63%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZPZ	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.63%	-50.06%	-6.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.63%	-34.17%	-22.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.17%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.98%	-22.41%	-29.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.36%	-21.96%	-3.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.54%	9.95%	+27.59%

Volatility

EZPZ vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) is 8.25%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 21.27%. This indicates that EZPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZPZ	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.25%	21.27%	-13.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.13%	50.66%	-15.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.70%	53.67%	-5.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.78%	32.31%	+14.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.78%	29.86%	+16.92%

EZPZ vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EZPZ vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	2.64%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZPZ and FLKR in my portfolio?

EZPZ and FLKR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZPZ or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (21.27%) compared to EZPZ (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPZ dropped -56.63% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, EZPZ or FLKR?

On 1-year performance, FLKR leads with 135.83% vs -45.45% for EZPZ. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EZPZ has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZPZ or FLKR?

Over the 1-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 135.83% return vs -45.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZPZ or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZPZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZPZ or FLKR?

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.

What is the main difference between EZPZ and FLKR?

EZPZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FLKR is South Korea Equities. EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.