EZPZ vs. FLKR
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR).
EZPZ and FLKR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EZPZ is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. It was launched on Feb 20, 2025. FLKR is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both EZPZ and FLKR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EZPZ vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EZPZ vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -23.94% | -10.23% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 24.40% | 67.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -23.94% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 24.40% return.
EZPZ
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- -23.94%
- 6M
- -43.46%
- 1Y
- -16.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLKR
- 1D
- 5.56%
- 1M
- -18.75%
- YTD
- 24.40%
- 6M
- 53.56%
- 1Y
- 126.63%
- 3Y*
- 28.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EZPZ vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EZPZ vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
EZPZ
FLKR
EZPZ vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZPZ | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | 3.62 | -3.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | 3.82 | -3.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.55 | -0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 5.34 | -5.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 21.76 | -22.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZPZ | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 3.62 | -3.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 0.31 | -0.91 |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPZ and FLKR is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EZPZ vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 3.11% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
EZPZ vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -52.38%, roughly equal to the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and FLKR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPZ | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.38% | -50.06% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.38% | -23.03% | -29.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.71% | -18.75% | -29.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.25% | -22.44% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.42% | 5.65% | +18.77% |
Volatility
EZPZ vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) is 14.00%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 22.16%. This indicates that EZPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EZPZ | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.00% | 22.16% | -8.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.76% | 30.18% | +9.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.54% | 35.28% | +13.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.47% | 25.99% | +23.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.47% | 26.40% | +23.07% |