EZPZ vs. ETHU
EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and ETHU (Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EZPZ is passively managed, while ETHU is actively managed. Over the past year, EZPZ returned -42.21% vs -80.06% for ETHU. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for ETHU.
Performance
EZPZ vs. ETHU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -34.43% return, which is significantly higher than ETHU's -78.43% return.
EZPZ
- 1D
- -6.18%
- 1M
- -26.82%
- YTD
- -34.43%
- 6M
- -36.79%
- 1Y
- -42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHU
- 1D
- -22.60%
- 1M
- -56.94%
- YTD
- -78.43%
- 6M
- -79.79%
- 1Y
- -80.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ vs. ETHU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -34.43% | -10.23% |
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | -78.43% | -39.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPZ and ETHU is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.91 |
The correlation between EZPZ and ETHU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPZ vs. ETHU — Risk / Return Rank
EZPZ
ETHU
EZPZ vs. ETHU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZPZ | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.93 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.86 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | -1.27 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZPZ | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | -0.58 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | -0.56 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
EZPZ vs. ETHU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, smaller than the maximum ETHU drawdown of -96.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and ETHU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPZ | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.78% | -96.27% | +40.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.78% | -93.66% | +37.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.78% | -96.27% | +40.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.92% | -69.51% | +47.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.82% | 62.88% | -32.06% |
Volatility
EZPZ vs. ETHU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) is 10.69%, while Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) has a volatility of 30.24%. This indicates that EZPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPZ | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 30.24% | -19.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | 94.97% | -58.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.23% | 139.25% | -92.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 143.70% | -95.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 143.70% | -95.84% |
EZPZ vs. ETHU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHU's 0.94% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZPZ vs. ETHU - Dividend Comparison
EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | 6.67% | 2.31% | 0.41% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, EZPZ and ETHU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ETHU has higher volatility (30.24%) compared to EZPZ (10.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPZ dropped -55.78% vs ETHU's -96.27%.
On 1-year performance, EZPZ leads with -42.21% vs -80.06% for ETHU. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZPZ has been the lower-risk option at 10.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EZPZ has performed better with a -42.21% return vs -80.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for ETHU.
ETHU has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.94% for ETHU.
ETHU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZPZ and ETHU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer