EZPZ vs. ETHD
EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EZPZ is passively managed, while ETHD is actively managed. Over the past year, EZPZ returned -42.21% vs -32.31% for ETHD. At a correlation of -0.91, they often move in opposite directions. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for ETHD.
Performance
EZPZ vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -34.43% return, which is significantly lower than ETHD's 106.48% return.
EZPZ
- 1D
- -6.18%
- 1M
- -26.82%
- YTD
- -34.43%
- 6M
- -36.79%
- 1Y
- -42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHD
- 1D
- 22.73%
- 1M
- 108.18%
- YTD
- 106.48%
- 6M
- 102.42%
- 1Y
- -32.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -34.43% | -10.23% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 106.48% | -77.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPZ and ETHD is -0.92, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | -0.91 |
The correlation between EZPZ and ETHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.92 to -0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPZ vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank
EZPZ
ETHD
EZPZ vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZPZ | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.07 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.39 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | -0.49 | -0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZPZ | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | -0.24 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | -0.30 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
EZPZ vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, smaller than the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and ETHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPZ | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.78% | -95.59% | +39.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.78% | -83.63% | +27.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.78% | -83.87% | +28.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.92% | -66.09% | +44.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.82% | 66.13% | -35.31% |
Volatility
EZPZ vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) is 10.69%, while ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a volatility of 25.74%. This indicates that EZPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPZ | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 25.74% | -15.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | 92.03% | -55.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.23% | 137.90% | -90.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 142.82% | -94.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 142.82% | -94.96% |
EZPZ vs. ETHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHD's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZPZ vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison
EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 8.47% | 156.62% | 19.15% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZPZ and ETHD have a correlation of -0.92, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHD has higher volatility (25.74%) compared to EZPZ (10.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPZ dropped -55.78% vs ETHD's -95.59%.
On 1-year performance, ETHD leads with -32.31% vs -42.21% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZPZ has been the lower-risk option at 10.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHD has performed better with a -32.31% return vs -42.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 8.47%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZPZ and ETHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer