EZPW vs. RGA
EZPW (EZCORP, Inc.) and RGA (Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — EZPW in Credit Services, RGA in Insurance - Reinsurance. Over the past 10 years, EZPW returned 12.60%/yr vs 11.32%/yr for RGA. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EZPW vs. RGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPW achieves a 53.30% return, which is significantly higher than RGA's 17.66% return. Over the past 10 years, EZPW has outperformed RGA with an annualized return of 12.60%, while RGA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.32% annualized return.
EZPW
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -16.21%
- 6M
- 38.79%
- YTD
- 53.30%
- 1Y
- 107.89%
- 3Y*
- 48.72%
- 5Y*
- 39.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.02%
RGA
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 19.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | $23.79M | $29.04M | $30.38M |
| $80.43M | $84.29M | $82.13M |
EZPW vs. RGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 53.30% | 58.92% | 39.82% | 7.24% | 10.58% | 53.86% | -29.77% | -11.77% | -36.64% | 14.55% |
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 17.66% | -2.97% | 34.38% | 16.39% | 33.04% | -3.21% | -27.02% | 18.29% | -8.71% | 25.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPW and RGA is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2008 | 0.35 |
The correlation between EZPW and RGA shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EZPW:
$1.74B
RGA:
$15.52B
EZPW:
$1.76
RGA:
$20.15
EZPW:
16.91
RGA:
11.76
EZPW:
0.11
RGA:
0.45
EZPW:
1.68
RGA:
0.58
EZPW:
$1.48B
RGA:
$18.13B
EZPW:
$865.21M
RGA:
$3.15B
EZPW:
$256.16M
RGA:
$1.46B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPW vs. RGA — Risk / Return Rank
EZPW
RGA
EZPW vs. RGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) and Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZPW | RGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.21 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.91 | 2.03 | +3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.70 | 5.07 | +14.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZPW vs. RGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPW drawdown since its inception was -97.28%, which is greater than RGA's maximum drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPW and RGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPW | RGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.28% | -65.75% | -31.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.35% | -12.68% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.51% | -27.11% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.94% | -27.11% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.59% | -65.75% | -10.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.80% | -2.39% | -19.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.93% | -11.61% | -47.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 5.16% | +0.34% |
Volatility
EZPW vs. RGA - Volatility Comparison
EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) has a higher volatility of 15.87% compared to Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) at 7.02%. This indicates that EZPW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPW | RGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.87% | 7.02% | +8.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.30% | 17.74% | +13.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.42% | 23.88% | +14.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.66% | 27.55% | +7.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.06% | 32.92% | +6.14% |
Dividends
EZPW vs. RGA - Dividend Comparison
EZPW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 1.76% | 1.79% | 1.63% | 2.04% | 2.15% | 2.61% | 2.42% | 1.59% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.64% |
Financials
EZPW vs. RGA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EZCORP, Inc. and Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EZPW vs. RGA - Profitability Comparison
EZPW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a gross profit of 260.04M and revenue of 446.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.
RGA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EZPW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.84M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
RGA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported an operating income of 441.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.
EZPW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a net income of 49.10M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.
RGA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a net income of 331.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EZPW and RGA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZPW has higher volatility (15.87%) compared to RGA (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPW dropped -97.28% vs RGA's -65.75%.
EZPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZPW and RGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer