EZPW vs. GFI
EZPW (EZCORP, Inc.) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. EZPW operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, EZPW returned 13.43%/yr vs 22.89%/yr for GFI. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EZPW vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPW achieves a 75.44% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -19.53% return. Over the past 10 years, EZPW has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 13.43%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 22.89% annualized return.
EZPW
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 59.43%
- YTD
- 75.44%
- 1Y
- 140.10%
- 3Y*
- 58.17%
- 5Y*
- 41.25%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
GFI
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- 6M
- -23.10%
- YTD
- -19.53%
- 1Y
- 47.03%
- 3Y*
- 40.04%
- 5Y*
- 34.68%
- 10Y*
- 22.89%
EZPW vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 75.44% | 58.92% | 39.82% | 7.24% | 10.58% | 53.86% | -29.77% | -11.77% | -36.64% | 14.55% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -19.53% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPW and GFI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.09 |
The correlation between EZPW and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EZPW:
$2.00B
GFI:
$30.56B
EZPW:
$1.76
GFI:
$5.39
EZPW:
19.36
GFI:
6.33
EZPW:
0.13
GFI:
0.10
EZPW:
1.92
GFI:
2.18
EZPW:
2.54
GFI:
3.62
EZPW:
$1.48B
GFI:
$13.98B
EZPW:
$865.21M
GFI:
$7.34B
EZPW:
$256.16M
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPW vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
EZPW
GFI
EZPW vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZPW | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.18 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.11 | 1.04 | +8.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.14 | 2.44 | +29.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZPW vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPW drawdown since its inception was -97.28%, which is greater than GFI's maximum drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPW and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPW | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.28% | -88.05% | -9.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.19% | -46.66% | +30.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.51% | -46.66% | +26.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.94% | -56.22% | +20.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.59% | -63.09% | -13.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.51% | -42.88% | +32.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.00% | -44.24% | -14.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 19.83% | -15.25% |
Volatility
EZPW vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI) have volatilities of 19.30% and 19.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPW | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.30% | 19.88% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.72% | 47.77% | -18.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.56% | 61.30% | -23.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.42% | 52.77% | -18.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.98% | 54.77% | -15.79% |
Dividends
EZPW vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
EZPW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.39% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Financials
EZPW vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EZCORP, Inc. and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EZPW vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
EZPW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a gross profit of 260.04M and revenue of 446.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
EZPW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.84M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
EZPW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a net income of 49.10M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EZPW and GFI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (19.88%) compared to EZPW (19.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPW dropped -97.28% vs GFI's -88.05%.
EZPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZPW and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer