EZET vs. FLKR

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZET is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while FLKR is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZET returned -49.07% vs 139.26% for FLKR. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EZET charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

EZET vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -36.99% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 76.23% return.

EZET

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 10.09%
• 6M: -18.59%
• YTD: -36.99%
• 1Y: -49.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.66%

FLKR

• 1D: 6.64%
• 1M: -4.82%
• 6M: 39.29%
• YTD: 76.23%
• 1Y: 139.26%
• 3Y*: 41.63%
• 5Y*: 15.43%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	$400.33K	$484.91K	$668.91K
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	$60.27M	$54.44M	$54.72M

EZET vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-36.99%	-11.23%	-4.77%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	76.23%	91.91%	-19.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EZET and FLKR is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.40

Return for Risk

EZET vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 3
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 4

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 87
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EZET vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZET	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.74	2.61	-3.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.95	2.84	-3.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.40	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	4.10	-4.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.07	14.19	-15.27

EZET vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZET Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZET and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZET vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -67.89%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZET	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.89%	-50.06%	-17.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.89%	-34.17%	-33.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.17%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.38%	-21.83%	-39.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.30%	-21.96%	-13.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.69%	9.85%	+35.84%

Volatility

EZET vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) is 11.10%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 21.75%. This indicates that EZET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZET	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.10%	21.75%	-10.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.45%	50.70%	-7.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.94%	53.70%	+13.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.19%	32.31%	+38.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.19%	29.87%	+41.32%

EZET vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EZET vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	2.62%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZET and FLKR in my portfolio?

EZET and FLKR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZET or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (21.75%) compared to EZET (11.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -67.89% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, EZET or FLKR?

On 1-year performance, FLKR leads with 139.26% vs -49.07% for EZET. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EZET has been the lower-risk option at 11.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZET or FLKR?

Over the 1-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 139.26% return vs -49.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZET or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZET or FLKR?

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.

What is the main difference between EZET and FLKR?

EZET is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FLKR is South Korea Equities. EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.