EXHAX vs. TIBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX).
EXHAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 31, 1995. TIBIX is an actively managed fund by Thornburg. It was launched on Dec 24, 2002.
Performance
EXHAX vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXHAX vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | -6.73% | 12.05% | 11.86% | 19.08% | -20.33% | 18.37% | 22.11% | 27.69% | -6.52% | 24.27% |
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I | 9.82% | 37.01% | 13.48% | 18.28% | -7.69% | 20.36% | -0.40% | 18.01% | -4.31% | 15.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXHAX achieves a -6.73% return, which is significantly lower than TIBIX's 9.82% return. Over the past 10 years, EXHAX has underperformed TIBIX with an annualized return of 9.28%, while TIBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return.
EXHAX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- YTD
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- 6.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
TIBIX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXHAX vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXHAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXHAX vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank
EXHAX
TIBIX
EXHAX vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXHAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 3.57 | -3.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 4.54 | -3.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.79 | -0.69 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 4.43 | -3.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 21.79 | -19.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXHAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 3.57 | -3.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 1.40 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.91 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.75 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXHAX and TIBIX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXHAX vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison
EXHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.39%, more than TIBIX's 5.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | 11.39% | 10.62% | 6.41% | 2.13% | 10.95% | 6.01% | 3.28% | 5.21% | 10.32% | 7.83% | 2.08% | 1.27% |
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I | 5.40% | 5.83% | 5.67% | 4.89% | 5.89% | 5.33% | 4.31% | 4.46% | 4.77% | 4.52% | 4.14% | 4.66% |
Drawdowns
EXHAX vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXHAX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, which is greater than TIBIX's maximum drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXHAX and TIBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXHAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.96% | -48.88% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -8.58% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | -20.79% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.53% | -34.85% | +5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.52% | -3.47% | -7.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -6.00% | -2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 1.75% | +1.54% |
Volatility
EXHAX vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) at 3.68%. This indicates that EXHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXHAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 3.68% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 6.57% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 10.83% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 11.11% | +3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 13.48% | +1.76% |