PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIBIX vs. PRPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIBIX vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIBIX achieves a 17.20% return, which is significantly higher than PRPFX's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, TIBIX has outperformed PRPFX with an annualized return of 12.65%, while PRPFX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.09% annualized return.


TIBIX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.98%
YTD
17.20%
6M
21.00%
1Y
39.22%
3Y*
26.55%
5Y*
16.27%
10Y*
12.65%

PRPFX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.45%
YTD
6.99%
6M
10.01%
1Y
23.88%
3Y*
21.56%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIBIX vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
17.20%37.01%13.48%18.28%-7.69%20.36%-0.40%18.01%-4.31%15.23%
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio
6.99%28.78%19.36%11.96%-5.48%10.87%18.80%19.20%-7.02%11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TIBIX and PRPFX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2003

0.65

The correlation between TIBIX and PRPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIBIX vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIBIX
TIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

PRPFX
PRPFX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PRPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PRPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIBIX vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIBIXPRPFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.76

2.03

+2.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.84

2.48

+4.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

1.42

+0.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.48

3.06

+4.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

29.26

8.59

+20.67

TIBIX vs. PRPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIBIX Sharpe Ratio is 4.76, which is higher than the PRPFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIBIX and PRPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIBIXPRPFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.76

2.03

+2.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.47

1.04

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

1.05

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.80

-0.04

Drawdowns

TIBIX vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIBIX drawdown since its inception was -48.88%, which is greater than PRPFX's maximum drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBIX and PRPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIBIXPRPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.88%

-27.16%

-21.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

-8.10%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.23%

-8.19%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.79%

-15.49%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.85%

-20.84%

-14.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.29%

+4.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-3.52%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

2.89%

-1.51%

Volatility

TIBIX vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) at 2.70%. This indicates that TIBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIBIXPRPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

2.70%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.98%

11.23%

-4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.46%

12.50%

-4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.16%

11.06%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.50%

10.62%

+2.88%

TIBIX vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIBIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIBIX vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison

TIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than PRPFX's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio
3.05%3.27%1.86%1.39%1.58%2.05%5.38%4.69%6.90%2.14%0.95%7.06%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
5.06%5.83%5.67%4.89%5.89%5.33%4.31%4.46%4.77%4.52%4.14%4.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIBIX and PRPFX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIBIX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to PRPFX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIBIX dropped -48.88% vs PRPFX's -27.16%.

TIBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIBIX and PRPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer