EXHAX vs. SICIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX).
EXHAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 31, 1995. SICIX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Nov 16, 2003.
Performance
EXHAX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXHAX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | -9.38% | 12.05% | 11.86% | 19.08% | -20.33% | 18.37% | 22.11% | 27.69% | -6.52% | 24.27% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 0.36% | 8.12% | 5.52% | 5.29% | -6.23% | 4.13% | 2.62% | 9.36% | -2.07% | 5.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXHAX achieves a -9.38% return, which is significantly lower than SICIX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, EXHAX has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 8.97%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.36% annualized return.
EXHAX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -9.38%
- 6M
- -5.53%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
SICIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXHAX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXHAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXHAX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank
EXHAX
SICIX
EXHAX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXHAX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 1.66 | -1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 2.20 | -1.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.34 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 2.19 | -2.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 8.95 | -8.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXHAX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.66 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.84 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.87 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.78 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXHAX and SICIX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXHAX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison
EXHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.72%, more than SICIX's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | 11.72% | 10.62% | 6.41% | 2.13% | 10.95% | 6.01% | 3.28% | 5.21% | 10.32% | 7.83% | 2.08% | 1.27% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.86% | 2.87% | 3.67% | 2.80% | 4.69% | 3.46% | 1.84% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
EXHAX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXHAX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, which is greater than SICIX's maximum drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXHAX and SICIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXHAX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.96% | -27.62% | -24.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -2.73% | -10.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | -10.94% | -16.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.53% | -11.61% | -17.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.06% | -2.39% | -10.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -3.59% | -5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 0.67% | +2.55% |
Volatility
EXHAX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 1.24%. This indicates that EXHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXHAX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 1.24% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 2.06% | +6.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 3.66% | +12.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 3.87% | +10.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 3.89% | +11.33% |