SICIX vs. GWPAX
Compare and contrast key facts about SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) and American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX).
SICIX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Nov 16, 2003. GWPAX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on May 18, 2012.
Performance
SICIX vs. GWPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SICIX vs. GWPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 0.82% | 8.12% | 5.52% | 5.29% | -6.23% | 4.13% | 2.62% | 9.36% | -2.07% | 5.13% |
GWPAX American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A | -5.63% | 20.47% | 20.17% | 28.76% | -26.97% | 18.59% | 25.34% | 27.19% | -6.59% | 25.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SICIX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly higher than GWPAX's -5.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SICIX has underperformed GWPAX with an annualized return of 3.41%, while GWPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.87% annualized return.
SICIX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 6.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.24%
- 10Y*
- 3.41%
GWPAX
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -6.92%
- YTD
- -5.63%
- 6M
- -3.30%
- 1Y
- 19.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SICIX vs. GWPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SICIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than GWPAX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SICIX vs. GWPAX — Risk / Return Rank
SICIX
GWPAX
SICIX vs. GWPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) and American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SICIX | GWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 1.05 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.34 | 1.60 | +0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.23 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 1.65 | +0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.65 | 6.68 | +2.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SICIX | GWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.05 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.42 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.66 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.68 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between SICIX and GWPAX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SICIX vs. GWPAX - Dividend Comparison
SICIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than GWPAX's 6.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.85% | 2.87% | 3.67% | 2.80% | 4.69% | 3.46% | 1.84% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.97% |
GWPAX American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A | 6.09% | 5.75% | 5.83% | 1.61% | 9.94% | 3.42% | 3.42% | 5.77% | 6.19% | 3.39% | 4.36% | 4.84% |
Drawdowns
SICIX vs. GWPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SICIX drawdown since its inception was -27.62%, smaller than the maximum GWPAX drawdown of -34.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SICIX and GWPAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SICIX | GWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.62% | -34.15% | +6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -11.78% | +9.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.94% | -34.15% | +23.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.61% | -34.15% | +22.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -8.81% | +6.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -5.77% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 2.91% | -2.23% |
Volatility
SICIX vs. GWPAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) is 1.35%, while American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that SICIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SICIX | GWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 6.61% | -5.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.10% | 11.28% | -9.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68% | 18.89% | -15.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.88% | 18.17% | -14.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.90% | 17.95% | -14.05% |