EXHAX vs. SCLAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX).
EXHAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 31, 1995. SCLAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2012.
Performance
EXHAX vs. SCLAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXHAX vs. SCLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | -9.38% | 12.05% | 11.86% | 19.08% | -20.33% | 18.37% | 22.11% | 27.69% | -6.52% | 24.27% |
SCLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund | -0.59% | 6.49% | 4.92% | 6.96% | -3.74% | 1.72% | 3.30% | 7.91% | -0.67% | 3.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXHAX achieves a -9.38% return, which is significantly lower than SCLAX's -0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, EXHAX has outperformed SCLAX with an annualized return of 8.97%, while SCLAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.96% annualized return.
EXHAX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -9.38%
- 6M
- -5.53%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
SCLAX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXHAX vs. SCLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXHAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SCLAX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXHAX vs. SCLAX — Risk / Return Rank
EXHAX
SCLAX
EXHAX vs. SCLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXHAX | SCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 1.82 | -1.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 2.54 | -2.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.36 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 2.06 | -1.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 8.48 | -7.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXHAX | SCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.82 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 1.00 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 1.08 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.94 | -0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXHAX and SCLAX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXHAX vs. SCLAX - Dividend Comparison
EXHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.72%, more than SCLAX's 1.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | 11.72% | 10.62% | 6.41% | 2.13% | 10.95% | 6.01% | 3.28% | 5.21% | 10.32% | 7.83% | 2.08% | 1.27% |
SCLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund | 1.89% | 1.88% | 7.87% | 4.06% | 1.90% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 4.67% | 0.54% | 3.77% | 0.69% | 1.18% |
Drawdowns
EXHAX vs. SCLAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXHAX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, which is greater than SCLAX's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXHAX and SCLAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXHAX | SCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.96% | -5.59% | -46.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -2.32% | -11.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | -5.59% | -22.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.53% | -5.59% | -23.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.06% | -2.23% | -10.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -1.15% | -7.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 0.56% | +2.66% |
Volatility
EXHAX vs. SCLAX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX) at 1.10%. This indicates that EXHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXHAX | SCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 1.10% | +3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 1.98% | +7.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 2.64% | +13.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 3.07% | +11.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 2.74% | +12.48% |