PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCLAX vs. LKBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCLAX vs. LKBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX) and LKCM Balanced Fund (LKBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCLAX achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly higher than LKBAX's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SCLAX has underperformed LKBAX with an annualized return of 3.26%, while LKBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.05% annualized return.


SCLAX

1D
0.29%
1M
0.68%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.78%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
3.26%

LKBAX

1D
0.21%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
0.95%
6M
0.76%
1Y
6.73%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
8.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCLAX vs. LKBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCLAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund
2.66%6.49%4.92%6.96%-3.74%1.72%3.30%7.91%-0.67%3.88%
LKBAX
LKCM Balanced Fund
0.95%8.44%10.97%10.85%-13.86%14.01%15.28%21.86%-2.15%12.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SCLAX and LKBAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.68

The correlation between SCLAX and LKBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCLAX vs. LKBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCLAX
SCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

LKBAX
LKBAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
LKBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
LKBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCLAX vs. LKBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX) and LKCM Balanced Fund (LKBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCLAXLKBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.16

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

1.17

+1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.01

4.62

+7.39

SCLAX vs. LKBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the LKBAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCLAX and LKBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCLAX vs. LKBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCLAX drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum LKBAX drawdown of -31.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCLAX and LKBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCLAXLKBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-31.40%

+25.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.32%

-5.71%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.41%

-11.65%

+8.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.59%

-19.63%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.59%

-26.04%

+20.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-1.66%

+1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.14%

-4.27%

+3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

1.44%

-0.85%

Volatility

SCLAX vs. LKBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX) is 1.24%, while LKCM Balanced Fund (LKBAX) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that SCLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LKBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCLAXLKBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

2.49%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

5.61%

-3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82%

7.22%

-4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.11%

10.87%

-7.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.78%

11.90%

-9.12%

SCLAX vs. LKBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCLAX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than LKBAX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCLAX vs. LKBAX - Dividend Comparison

SCLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than LKBAX's 5.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LKBAX
LKCM Balanced Fund
5.96%6.00%4.60%3.49%3.59%4.41%4.18%5.95%3.02%4.09%5.06%3.50%
SCLAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund
1.83%1.88%7.87%4.06%1.90%2.79%1.01%4.67%0.54%3.77%0.69%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCLAX and LKBAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LKBAX has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to SCLAX (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCLAX dropped -5.59% vs LKBAX's -31.40%.

SCLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCLAX and LKBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer