EXHAX vs. MCDWX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EXHAX (Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series) and MCDWX (Manning & Napier Credit Series) are both mutual funds - EXHAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Manning & Napier, while MCDWX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Manning & Napier. Over the past 5 years, EXHAX returned 5.58%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for MCDWX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EXHAX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for MCDWX.

Performance

EXHAX vs. MCDWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXHAX achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly higher than MCDWX's 0.56% return.

EXHAX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 2.84%
• YTD: 3.13%
• 6M: 4.69%
• 1Y: 13.10%
• 3Y*: 11.81%
• 5Y*: 5.58%
• 10Y*: 10.03%

MCDWX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.80%
• 1Y: 5.58%
• 3Y*: 5.54%
• 5Y*: 1.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXHAX vs. MCDWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series	3.13%	12.05%	11.86%	19.08%	-20.33%	18.37%	33.58%
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series	0.56%	7.57%	4.13%	7.31%	-11.13%	0.01%	8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EXHAX and MCDWX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020	0.25

The correlation between EXHAX and MCDWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EXHAX vs. MCDWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXHAX

EXHAX Risk / Return Rank: 13
EXHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
EXHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
EXHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
EXHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EXHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

MCDWX

MCDWX Risk / Return Rank: 41
MCDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
MCDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MCDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
MCDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
MCDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXHAX vs. MCDWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EXHAX	MCDWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.82	-0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	2.64	-1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.36	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	2.52	-1.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.77	8.26	-4.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EXHAX vs. MCDWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXHAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the MCDWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXHAX and MCDWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EXHAX	MCDWX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	1.82	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.34	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.59	-0.16

Drawdowns

EXHAX vs. MCDWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXHAX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, which is greater than MCDWX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXHAX and MCDWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EXHAX	MCDWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.96%	-15.96%	-36.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.33%	-2.17%	-11.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.05%	-4.22%	-11.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.63%	-15.96%	-11.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-0.95%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.85%	-4.15%	-4.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	0.66%	+2.91%

Volatility

EXHAX vs. MCDWX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) at 1.07%. This indicates that EXHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCDWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EXHAX	MCDWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.95%	1.07%	+1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.57%	2.17%	+7.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.09%	2.96%	+9.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.48%	4.63%	+9.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.28%	4.38%	+10.90%

EXHAX vs. MCDWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXHAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MCDWX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

EXHAX vs. MCDWX - Dividend Comparison

EXHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.30%, more than MCDWX's 4.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series	10.30%	10.62%	6.41%	2.13%	10.95%	6.01%	3.28%	5.21%	10.32%	7.83%	2.08%	1.27%
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series	4.47%	4.83%	4.41%	4.48%	3.25%	4.45%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EXHAX and MCDWX in my portfolio?

EXHAX and MCDWX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EXHAX or MCDWX?

EXHAX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to MCDWX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXHAX dropped -51.96% vs MCDWX's -15.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCDWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.