EXBAX vs. MNBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX).
EXBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 1993. MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993.
Performance
EXBAX vs. MNBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXBAX vs. MNBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | -4.84% | 9.29% | 6.11% | 11.13% | -14.52% | 7.97% | 14.96% | 16.15% | -3.54% | 11.59% |
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -6.16% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXBAX achieves a -4.84% return, which is significantly higher than MNBAX's -6.16% return. Over the past 10 years, EXBAX has underperformed MNBAX with an annualized return of 5.08%, while MNBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.19% annualized return.
EXBAX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -4.84%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
MNBAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXBAX vs. MNBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXBAX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MNBAX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXBAX vs. MNBAX — Risk / Return Rank
EXBAX
MNBAX
EXBAX vs. MNBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXBAX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 0.30 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 0.50 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.06 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 0.25 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.69 | 1.05 | +0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXBAX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 0.30 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.27 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.64 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.45 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXBAX and MNBAX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXBAX vs. MNBAX - Dividend Comparison
EXBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, less than MNBAX's 10.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | 6.06% | 5.77% | 4.57% | 2.27% | 0.99% | 6.67% | 6.31% | 4.83% | 5.08% | 6.09% | 1.81% | 0.58% |
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.81% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
Drawdowns
EXBAX vs. MNBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXBAX drawdown since its inception was -29.86%, smaller than the maximum MNBAX drawdown of -39.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXBAX and MNBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXBAX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.86% | -39.62% | +9.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.37% | -9.23% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | -21.95% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.23% | -21.95% | +2.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -8.87% | +1.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -6.68% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 2.17% | -0.50% |
Volatility
EXBAX vs. MNBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) is 2.98%, while Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that EXBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXBAX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 3.40% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.03% | 6.27% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.91% | 10.29% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 9.38% | -1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 9.66% | -2.06% |