EXBAX vs. MNDFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX).
EXBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 1993. MNDFX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Nov 7, 2008.
Performance
EXBAX vs. MNDFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXBAX vs. MNDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | -4.84% | 9.29% | 6.11% | 11.13% | -14.52% | 7.97% | 14.96% | 16.15% | -3.54% | 11.59% |
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 5.01% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 22.45% | 2.44% | -28.95% | -4.30% | 23.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXBAX achieves a -4.84% return, which is significantly lower than MNDFX's 5.01% return. Over the past 10 years, EXBAX has outperformed MNDFX with an annualized return of 5.08%, while MNDFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.78% annualized return.
EXBAX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -4.84%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
MNDFX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXBAX vs. MNDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXBAX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MNDFX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXBAX vs. MNDFX — Risk / Return Rank
EXBAX
MNDFX
EXBAX vs. MNDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXBAX | MNDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 1.15 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 1.65 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.25 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 1.41 | -1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.69 | 5.63 | -3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXBAX | MNDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 1.15 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.61 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.22 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.40 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXBAX and MNDFX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXBAX vs. MNDFX - Dividend Comparison
EXBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, less than MNDFX's 9.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | 6.06% | 5.77% | 4.57% | 2.27% | 0.99% | 6.67% | 6.31% | 4.83% | 5.08% | 6.09% | 1.81% | 0.58% |
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 9.36% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
Drawdowns
EXBAX vs. MNDFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXBAX drawdown since its inception was -29.86%, smaller than the maximum MNDFX drawdown of -62.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXBAX and MNDFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXBAX | MNDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.86% | -62.03% | +32.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.37% | -12.54% | +5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | -17.87% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.23% | -62.03% | +42.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -5.55% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -12.11% | +7.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 3.14% | -1.47% |
Volatility
EXBAX vs. MNDFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) is 2.98%, while Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that EXBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXBAX | MNDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 3.14% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.03% | 8.66% | -3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.91% | 16.53% | -8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 14.51% | -7.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 21.67% | -14.07% |