EWW vs. ASHR

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

EWW (iShares MSCI Mexico ETF) and ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EWW is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index, while ASHR is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWW returned 7.89%/yr vs 5.65%/yr for ASHR. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWW charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHR.

Performance

EWW vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWW achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly higher than ASHR's 7.49% return. Over the past 10 years, EWW has outperformed ASHR with an annualized return of 7.89%, while ASHR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.65% annualized return.

EWW

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 13.18%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 33.34%
• 3Y*: 10.87%
• 5Y*: 13.02%
• 10Y*: 7.89%

ASHR

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 6M: 9.62%
• 1Y: 35.11%
• 3Y*: 11.43%
• 5Y*: -1.32%
• 10Y*: 5.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWW vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF	13.18%	53.65%	-28.22%	40.32%	1.24%	20.27%	-3.06%	12.64%	-14.58%	14.47%
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	7.49%	27.02%	11.95%	-12.52%	-27.52%	-1.57%	36.29%	36.50%	-28.45%	33.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EWW and ASHR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013	0.35

EWW vs. ASHR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWW	ASHR
Basic Materials	26.2%	9.4%
Consumer Defensive	23.9%	6.7%
Financial Services	17.8%	19.1%
Industrials	12.7%	16.1%
Communication Services	9.8%	0.8%
Real Estate	7.7%	0.4%
Consumer Cyclical	1.4%	6.4%
Healthcare	0.5%	4.4%
Energy	-	2.5%
Technology	-	31.1%
Utilities	-	3.1%

Return for Risk

EWW vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWW

EWW Risk / Return Rank: 50
EWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
EWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EWW Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
EWW Martin Ratio Rank: 54

ASHR

ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 75
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 68
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWW vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWW	ASHR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.97	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.75	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.35	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	4.41	-2.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.25	12.89	-4.64

EWW vs. ASHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWW Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the ASHR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWW and ASHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWW vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWW drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, which is greater than ASHR's maximum drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWW and ASHR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWW	ASHR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.94%	-51.30%	-13.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.98%	-7.69%	-6.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.17%	-33.12%	+1.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.17%	-44.59%	+13.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.62%	-51.30%	-2.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.40%	-17.64%	+14.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.51%	-29.15%	+10.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	2.63%	+1.30%

Volatility

EWW vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) at 6.04%. This indicates that EWW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWW	ASHR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.96%	6.04%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.46%	12.08%	+6.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.76%	17.24%	+4.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.58%	23.92%	-1.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.39%	24.06%	+1.33%

EWW vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWW has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWW vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

EWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than ASHR's 2.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	2.15%	2.31%	1.13%	2.48%	1.13%	0.88%	0.81%	0.98%	1.32%	0.84%	0.73%	30.13%
EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF	3.07%	3.48%	4.39%	2.19%	3.64%	2.06%	1.43%	2.92%	2.30%	2.22%	1.77%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWW and ASHR in my portfolio?

EWW and ASHR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWW or ASHR?

EWW has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to ASHR (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWW dropped -64.94% vs ASHR's -51.30%.

Which ETF is better, EWW or ASHR?

On 10-year performance, EWW leads with 7.89% vs 5.65% for ASHR. On fees, EWW is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ASHR has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWW or ASHR?

Over the 10-year period, EWW has performed better with a 7.89% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWW or ASHR?

EWW is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWW or ASHR?

EWW has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 2.15% for ASHR.

What is the main difference between EWW and ASHR?

EWW is categorized as Latin America Equities, while ASHR is China Equities. EWW tracks MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index, while ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWW and 0.65% for ASHR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.