PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EWW vs. FLMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EWW vs. FLMX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

EWW (iShares MSCI Mexico ETF) and FLMX (Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds - EWW tracks the MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index while FLMX tracks the FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWW returned 13.01%/yr vs 13.03%/yr for FLMX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EWW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLMX.

Performance

EWW vs. FLMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWW achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than FLMX's 13.07% return.

EWW

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.74%
6M
3.75%
YTD
12.42%
1Y
33.28%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
7.35%
ALL TIME*
8.93%

FLMX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.95%
6M
3.59%
YTD
13.07%
1Y
33.85%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

EWW

iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
$76.09M$75.24M$92.91M

FLMX

Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF
$234.61K$237.08K$407.38K

EWW vs. FLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF		12.42%53.65%-28.22%40.32%1.24%20.27%-3.06%12.64%-14.58%-0.68%
FLMX
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF		13.07%53.62%-28.45%39.35%2.40%19.58%-3.50%12.13%-13.32%-0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between EWW and FLMX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.92

The correlation between EWW and FLMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWW vs. FLMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EWW
FLMX

Basic Materials

24.7%
18.8%

Consumer Defensive

24.4%
29.5%

Financial Services

19.7%
20.3%

Industrials

12.5%
14.2%

Communication Services

10.1%
8.4%

Real Estate

6.5%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
1.4%

Healthcare

0.5%

-

Energy

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

EWW
24.7%
FLMX
18.8%

Consumer Defensive

EWW
24.4%
FLMX
29.5%

Financial Services

EWW
19.7%
FLMX
20.3%

Industrials

EWW
12.5%
FLMX
14.2%

Communication Services

EWW
10.1%
FLMX
8.4%

Real Estate

EWW
6.5%
FLMX
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EWW
1.1%
FLMX
1.4%

Healthcare

EWW
0.5%
FLMX

-

Energy

EWW

-

FLMX

-

Technology

EWW

-

FLMX

-

Utilities

EWW

-

FLMX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Mexico ETF

Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF

Often compared with EWW:
EWW vs. EWZEWW vs. ILFEWW vs. SPYEWW vs. VOOEWW vs. MEXXEWW vs. ECHEWW vs. EIDO
Often compared with FLMX:
FLMX vs. MEXXFLMX vs. AAAFLMX vs. VOOFLMX vs. SCHDFLMX vs. QQQFLMX vs. SPYFLMX vs. BRZU

Return for Risk

EWW vs. FLMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
EWW
EWW Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWW Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
FLMX
FLMX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWW vs. FLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EWWFLMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.46
1.52

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.08
2.16

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.33

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.47

7.44

+0.03

EWW vs. FLMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWW Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the FLMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWW and FLMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWW vs. FLMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWW drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, which is greater than FLMX's maximum drawdown of -50.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWW and FLMX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EWWFLMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.94%

-50.05%

-14.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.98%

-14.18%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.17%

-31.72%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.17%

-31.72%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.62%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.05%

-3.89%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.45%

-11.92%

-6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

4.43%

-0.12%

Volatility

EWW vs. FLMX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) have volatilities of 5.24% and 5.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EWWFLMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

5.16%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.57%

18.37%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.04%

21.77%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

22.08%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.25%

24.60%

+0.65%

EWW vs. FLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMX's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWW vs. FLMX - Dividend Comparison

EWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than FLMX's 3.78% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF		3.21%3.48%4.39%2.19%3.64%2.06%1.43%2.92%2.30%2.22%1.77%2.34%
FLMX
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF		3.78%3.99%3.31%2.90%4.22%3.15%1.48%2.95%2.51%0.31%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.99, EWW and FLMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EWW has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to FLMX (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWW dropped -64.94% vs FLMX's -50.05%.

On 5-year performance, FLMX leads with 13.03% vs 13.01% for EWW. On fees, FLMX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLMX has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLMX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWW.

FLMX has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 3.21% for EWW.

EWW tracks MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index, while FLMX tracks FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWW and 0.19% for FLMX.

FLMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWW and FLMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer