PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EWW vs. ILF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EWW vs. ILF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

EWW (iShares MSCI Mexico ETF) and ILF (iShares Latin American 40 ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds from iShares - EWW tracks the MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index while ILF tracks the S&P Latin America 40 (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWW returned 7.35%/yr vs 7.78%/yr for ILF. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EWW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for ILF.

Performance

EWW vs. ILF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWW achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than ILF's 17.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EWW has underperformed ILF with an annualized return of 7.35%, while ILF has yielded a comparatively higher 7.78% annualized return.

EWW

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.74%
6M
3.75%
YTD
12.42%
1Y
33.28%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
7.35%
ALL TIME*
8.93%

ILF

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.99%
6M
1.31%
YTD
17.64%
1Y
48.11%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
7.78%
ALL TIME*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

EWW

iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
$76.09M$75.24M$92.91M

ILF

iShares Latin American 40 ETF
$79.35M$71.98M$85.23M

EWW vs. ILF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF		12.42%53.65%-28.22%40.32%1.24%20.27%-3.06%12.64%-14.58%14.47%
ILF
iShares Latin American 40 ETF		17.64%52.65%-23.11%33.14%9.81%-13.59%-11.71%13.77%-6.85%26.33%

Correlation

The correlation between EWW and ILF is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2001

0.76

The correlation between EWW and ILF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWW vs. ILF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EWW
ILF

Basic Materials

24.7%
22.0%

Consumer Defensive

24.4%
9.6%

Financial Services

19.7%
34.5%

Industrials

12.5%
9.6%

Communication Services

10.1%
6.0%

Real Estate

6.5%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
1.3%

Healthcare

0.5%
1.1%

Energy

-

10.6%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

4.7%

Basic Materials

EWW
24.7%
ILF
22.0%

Consumer Defensive

EWW
24.4%
ILF
9.6%

Financial Services

EWW
19.7%
ILF
34.5%

Industrials

EWW
12.5%
ILF
9.6%

Communication Services

EWW
10.1%
ILF
6.0%

Real Estate

EWW
6.5%
ILF
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EWW
1.1%
ILF
1.3%

Healthcare

EWW
0.5%
ILF
1.1%

Energy

EWW

-

ILF
10.6%

Technology

EWW

-

ILF

-

Utilities

EWW

-

ILF
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Mexico ETF

iShares Latin American 40 ETF

Often compared with EWW:
EWW vs. EWZEWW vs. FLMXEWW vs. SPYEWW vs. VOOEWW vs. MEXXEWW vs. ECHEWW vs. EIDO
Often compared with ILF:
ILF vs. EWZILF vs. FLLAILF vs. FLNILF vs. FLBRILF vs. EPUILF vs. VOOILF vs. VOOG

Return for Risk

EWW vs. ILF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
EWW
EWW Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWW Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
ILF
ILF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ILF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ILF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWW vs. ILF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EWWILFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.46
2.13

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.08
2.78

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

3.42

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.47

8.81

-1.34

EWW vs. ILF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWW Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the ILF Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWW and ILF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWW vs. ILF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWW drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, roughly equal to the maximum ILF drawdown of -67.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWW and ILF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EWWILFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.94%

-67.48%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.98%

-13.94%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.17%

-23.97%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.17%

-29.71%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.62%

-57.79%

+4.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.05%

-5.98%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.45%

-23.84%

+5.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

5.40%

-1.09%

Volatility

EWW vs. ILF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) is 5.24%, while iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that EWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EWWILFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

6.14%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.57%

18.40%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.04%

22.44%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

23.10%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.25%

28.26%

-3.01%

EWW vs. ILF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ILF's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWW vs. ILF - Dividend Comparison

EWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than ILF's 3.34% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF		3.21%3.48%4.39%2.19%3.64%2.06%1.43%2.92%2.30%2.22%1.77%2.34%
ILF
iShares Latin American 40 ETF		3.34%4.39%7.44%4.61%12.72%8.47%1.88%3.09%3.12%1.80%1.59%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

EWW and ILF have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILF has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to EWW (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWW dropped -64.94% vs ILF's -67.48%.

On 10-year performance, ILF leads with 7.78% vs 7.35% for EWW. On fees, ILF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, EWW has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILF has performed better with a 7.78% return vs 7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWW.

ILF has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 3.21% for EWW.

EWW tracks MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index, while ILF tracks S&P Latin America 40 (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWW and 0.47% for ILF.

ILF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWW and ILF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer